Effects of Globalization

1405 Words6 Pages
Positive Paradigms of Globalization Globalization is a process that allocates the interchange of views, culture, product and integration on an international scale. Within the anthology Good Reasons with Contemporary Arguments, it features an article that was written by Laura Carlsen named “WalMart vs. Pyramids” as well as an article written by Robyn Meredith and Suzanne Hoppough called “Why Globalization Is Good.” Hoppough and Meredith go on in the article to prove that there are numerous examples of globalization in the world. Laura Carlsen, on the other hand in her article, pinpoints various examples of how globalization is a positive asset in the global world and how it allows for interdependence between nations. Together they form an effectual argument by applying a plethora of different rhetorical appeals throughout their essay, effectively utilizing pathos, ethos and logos. This, in turn, allows for the audience to “connect” with Meredith and Hoppough while allowing the audience to be drawn in which helps prove their point to a far more high-class standing than Carlsen’s. Within Hoppough’s and Meredith article, they go on to utilize the three rhetorical appeals to prove that, if utilized correctly, it is a powerful advantage to nations and the global community. In their article, they continue on to interview a woman who is middle-aged (23) and works for a global cargo shipper based out of Beijing. “My parents were both teachers when they were my age, and they earned 30 yuan [$3.70] a month. I earn 4,000 yuan [$500] a month, live comfortably, and feel I have better opportunities than my parents did” (Meredith and Klare 2). Within in this quote, it allows the audience to connect with the writer. It encompasses the three points of rhetoric to appeal to the audience and allows them to “connect.” This quote also allows an insight into worthy information

More about Effects of Globalization

Open Document