Effectiveness Of A Personalised Induction

1704 Words7 Pages
A Personalised induction will always be more effective. Discuss. Base your answer on theoretical concepts and techniques presented in class. 25 January- 2014 Words Count - In this essay I will be looking at the methods and techniques that are used to personalise a screed to suit working and discuss with different clients, and based on my understanding of Hypnosis and in my conclusion I will consider whether a personalised induction will always be effective. What is a personalised screeds it is, in my opinion it is a hypnotic induction that is made to suit specific every type of individual. So to manage to reach subconscious more easily we need first to know much better the client , likes and dislikes, hobbies, work place, and…show more content…
Erickson was a psychiatrist with a private practice in Phoenix and the father of permissive hypnotherapy. As a young doctor Erickson was interested in applying hypnosis in the medical context. Later in his career he was responsible for the American Medical Association recognising hypnotherapy as a legitimate medical treatment. Erickson originally learned the traditional authoritarian style and gradually changed his style because he considered a permissive approach more effective for helping his patients experience change in their lives. To best summarize, here is a quote of Milton Erickson on the Co-operation Approach quoted from pg.166-167 of “The Collected Papers, Volume I”: “Ericksons’s approach was first and foremost one of cooperation: Hypnosis should primarily be the outcome of a situation in which interpersonal and intrapersonal relationships are developed constructively to serve the purpose of both the hypnotist and subject. This cannot be done by following rigid procedures and fixed methods or by striving to reach a single specific goal. The complexity of human behaviour and its underlying motivation makes necessary a cognizance of the multitude of factors existing in any situations arising between two personalities engaged in a joint activity. (1952; in Rossi, 1980, pp 166-167). The hypnotist can only guide, direct,…show more content…
The major difference is that hypnosis greatly intensifies more involvement within these basic psychological processes, sometimes to the point where we forget that our “as if” world is just a simulation. Also, hypnosis is more rigid and fixed ways we typically relate to time and space. In short the trance, become more temporarily suspended. Doing a personalised induction on a client we look first at the external appearance, they behaviours and their personality, and after having a good look and manage to see what style of induction it suit him, after finding out if is permissive or authoritarian you apply the correct one, if is authoritarian then you need to be more direct approach, if it permissive like me personally then you will need to be have a indirect approach. The most simple way to think about personalised induction is that more you know about the client personality, more easy is for client to be open to trance and relax, and then you can work easy with the suggestion and subconscious mind, so they can enjoy them and be
Open Document