Addressing International Legal and Ethical Issues Simulation Summary What are the issues………..international When a U.S. company has decided to enter into business with a foreign company the same binding bases of business is applied. The base of business is the same contract that would bind companies to agreements in the U.S. Possible disagreements and disputes are expected in the international trade sector. The reality is that the contract that binds the companies to the original agreement, is used to settle these disputes without further legal action. The U.S. company wants to protect its interests by making sure that the contracts are enforceable in the foreign country. Considering the foreign companies culture and ethics in business transactions
b. Leading and coordinating U.S. representation abroad, conveying U.S. foreign policy to foreign governments and international organizations through U.S. embassies and consulates in foreign countries and diplomatic missions to international organizations. c. Conducting negotiations and conducting agreements and treaties on issues ranging from trade to nuclear weapons. d. Coordinating and supporting international activities of other U.S. agencies and officials. e. Protecting and assisting U.S. citizens living or traveling abroad.
Opponents also cite problems with defining who is considered a journalist or news gatherer and who is not. Former Army scientist Dr. Steven Hatfill sat down with Executive Director for The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and presented the argument unqualified individuals could be deemed as journalist and be subject to the federal shield law. In its current form, the law protects only "a person who, for financial gain or livelihood, is engaged in journalism," which involves the "gathering, preparing, collecting, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting, or publishing of news or information that concerns local, national, or international events or
The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) regulates the exporting of items that must be documented as specified by the EAR and must be cleared through the U.S. Customs. Some exports may also require licensing (Export.gov). If these laws are violated, Riordan could face fines. It is the responsibility of managers to educate their associates and provide training on these laws so no violations will occur. This will also aid in preventing violation of any
Addressing International Legal and Ethical Issues Simulation Summary Your Name LAW 421 September 11, 2012 Your Instructor What are the issues involved in resolving legal disputes in international transactions? Any time there are contracts with other countries, there has to be some kind of clause for resolving legal disputes. Additionally the clause must include some type of enforcement to ensure resolution (Melvin, 2011) What are some practical considerations of taking legal action against a foreign business partner in another country? Since United States law is only enforceable in United States courts, the laws of the foreign country must be taken into consideration. Because the law of the foreign country is the only law that can be enforceable contracts are only as good as the backing of the country's backing and are only binding in that instance.
These policymakers use the information that CIA provides to help them formulate US policy toward other countries. It is also important to know that CIA is not a law enforcement organization. That is the job of the FBI; however, the CIA and the FBI cooperate on a number of issues, such as counterintelligence and counterterrorism. Additionally, the CIA may also engage in covert action at the President’s direction and in accordance with applicable law. The US Congress has had oversight responsibility of the CIA since the Agency was established in 1947.
The U. S. government has found a way around the civil laws that the country was built on. Without any delay or hesitation, the U.S. government detains criminals without prosecution or trial. The issue of Habeas Corpus is simple. Should the government be allowed to detain potential threats without the consent of a jury? The habeas corpus is a right to be released due to unlawful imprisonment.
The Patriot Act was ultimately supposed to protect Americans from terrorism by giving the government more power. According to the ACLU, the Act contained many flaws. It gave law enforcement freedom to search homes with only suspicions of terrorism, with no warrant involved. Not only did the government not have a warrant but gave no warning either before nor after the searches. It also gave the government the right to medical and tax records as well as the books bought and borrowed by Americans.
A writ of habeas corpus is a directive from a court requiring the government to justify the imprisonment of a citizen. Because of the writ of habeas corpus guarantee, an individual cannot be held for more than a short period of time without being formally charged with a crime. (McNamara, 2010) The Due process clause also affords the accused of the right to trial by a jury of ones peers. These case are handled so that in a federal proceeding formal charges can not be levied without a grand jury hearing where an indictment must be issued. The jury trial and grand jury guarantees are intended to protect private citizens from over-zealous police officers, prosecutors and judges.
(“Immigration: In the Vanguard”, 1999, p. 32) In simplest terms illegal aliens are illegal and like any crime their presence must be controlled. Moreover, their presence and employment is manifestly unjust as they are taking resources and opportunities from legitimate citizens. Therefore, it is essential that the government continue to police illegal immigration and commits resources to that task. In the words of President Clinton, “We must say no to illegal immigration so we can continue to say yes to legal immigration.” (“Immigration Reform: The Issues”, p.