Decline Of Radicalism Analysis

548 Words3 Pages
In the excerpt, from The Decline of Radicalism, Daniel J. Boorstin shows the dissimilarities between dissent and disagreement. He says, “Disagreement is the life blood of democracy, dissension is its cancer.” This quote is proven to be invalid throughout history. Examples such as women and African Americans trying to get what they know they should and what they deserved to. Throughout history, women were not treated with the same rights as men were. Many of them tried extremely hard to get the rights that men had, trying to vote especially. Until one day when a group of women decided to break the law and vote, even though they were not allowed to do so. This is an example of dissent, something that two people disagree on but there is no argument. You could do nothing about this back then. All the time that those women were alive, there was nothing that said that women could vote. Then, a few years later the 19th amendment was written, it had guaranteed the rights for women to vote. These women changed life for all the ones living today. Dissent let the women go forward with their plan, and…show more content…
Most people don’t like the idea of that, because when someone has their mindset on something they don’t change their mind and are stubborn about it, and that is when dissent comes in and changes the other persons mind. This reveals the good side of dissent, which shows that dissent is better then disagreement. Women eventually got their way with the law, and were able to vote. If they had not dissented against it, it probably would of taken a lot longer then it did for the 19th amendment to be written. Rose Parks and the African Americans she was with also changed the way that they were treated, and they are now just as equal as any other white person living

More about Decline Of Radicalism Analysis

Open Document