Decline Of The Han Vs. Decline Of The Roman Empire

695 Words3 Pages
Compare and Contrast Essay Decline of the Han vs. Decline of the Roman Empire The collapse of the Han and the Roman Empires were both due to internal conflicts within the government and among their people. Both empires started to fall apart as disorganization and lack of a central government began to influence the whole empire. Political chaos led to the breakdown of the economy which spread to other things, and the spread of new religions came too late to save the crumbling empires from the destruction of themselves. The downfall of both civilizations began as their political rulers’ superiority became so disorganized and chaotic that everything just started to fall apart. Citizens began to revolt and in the Han dynasty in 220 C.E., the emperor was rebelled against among middle and lower class peasants and was eventually disposed of. After the emperor was overthrown, the empire divided into three separate kingdoms creating more political weakness and confusion for several decades before the absolute fall of the Han dynasty. In Rome, the subject was more focused on how the emperors would rule, and how much power they were given. The question of how they would be appointed, and how much power they would have in governing the region, caused political unrest. This caused a line of weak rulers, constantly battling in hunger for power. The decentralization of power in the Han and Roman Empires are what started the eventual defeat of themselves. As the decline of the political system began, economic life started to give way simultaneously. In both societies, large land owners were growing even more, avoiding taxes and creating their own little private armies. Seeing the minute armies, farmers clustered around the small, yet sufficient, protection of the large landowners, giving up the control of their farming lands. But the economic problems in Rome were much more
Open Document