The men and woman of law enforcement risk their lives daily to make sure the citizens in their area are safe. There are certain races, ages and times of the day in which an officer is assaulted or killed in the line of duty. In order to get accurate statistics, in-depth research has to be done. In order to design an accurate research on statistics on “Officers Assaulted or Killed in the Line of Duty” you must start with the programs that accurately analyze the individual states that report such activity within their department. Once this information is obtained, than one can determine an approximate national average of officers assaulted or killed in the line of duty.
To answer the question, many things are done daily to prevent police brutality. Nearly every case of police brutality presents a legal dynamic of related but separate civil and criminal cases. Once a citizen claims police abuse, there is almost always a contradictory allegation by the police accusing the citizen of being the initial aggressor and primary criminal actor against the police. (Lawson T.F. 2013) Police often blame the victim of police brutality when accused of being too brutal with their use of force.
Hypothesis of Police Brutality The problems with police brutality are major issues that face both law enforcement and the communities they protect. My hypothesis is that a lifelong learning process which lacked training and accountability contribute to police brutality. Police brutality has been a major issue since the 1900’s and continues to be a issue in today’s society that plagues our communities and people. Police brutality is defined as unwarranted use of force, and other mistreatment of citizens as police officers are challenged everyday their mission is to protect and serve but it seems their mission has become shoot first and ask questions later. When looking into the sociological concepts of police brutality you must look into
Police Brutality Police officers are tasked to protect and serve, that is there job. Everyday police officers risk their lives to protect ours. In some cases officers must use force to contain an unruly suspect and/or protect their own or another life. Police officers are given certain guidelines they must follow when deciding if force is necessary. Officers must use the minimum amount of force necessary when trying to contain a suspect, but that is not always the case.
Anytime you make a mistake it can affect your life and their lives too. That why anytime driving someone must use not only common senses but also all senses to make sure he is safer. When u go to any driving school the first thing you learn is to use mostly 4 senses (hearing, smelling, touching, sight.) so anytime that one is not in presence, something can happen involuntarily and it can cause a big injury and sometimes lost of lives. So, it is now clear that when using cell phone while driving you are committing a big crime which can be sued as a killing crime because you are putting your life in danger
They deal with dishonest and dangerous people, and also victimized and abused people. It takes a strong person to deal with all those situations, day in and day out, while keeping the traits that make them a good police officer. As long as the officer has integrity, courage, and a strong set of moral values, there is no reason he will not have a successful
The primary and most difficult portion of a police officer’s duties is to protect themselves and the public from harm or death. This sometimes requires the use of excessive force but the degree the officer uses can always be in question. Deadly force is defined in the Rampart Independent Review as "responsible and necessary" to protect others or themselves from bodily harm (Drooyan, R, 2000). Deadly force is essentially broken down into three categories: immediate defense of life, to prevent crime where people are at risk of death or serious bodily injury and to apprehend a fleeing felon who poses a serious risk to others. An officer must exercise deadly force appropriately by always using alternatives and only resorting to such extreme measures when deemed necessary.
While it is true that guns are involved in thousands of deaths per year in the United States, there are things that lead to far more deaths than guns. According to Levitt, in 2009, 45,000 people died in autmobile related accidents and only 30,000 died in gun related incidents (151). Using the logic of those against gun rights, it’s the car’s fault not the driver’s fault that 45,000 people die every year. This is just an irrational attempt to shift reponsibility off of the people that actually cause these incidents. Another example that shows that guns aren’t so dangerous is that in any given year there is one drowning of a child for every 11,000 residential pools as compared to 1 death for every 1 million guns, or 175 children killed for the over 200 million guns owned in the U.S. (Levitt 150).
The Use of Police Force: Expand It, Reduce It, or Eliminate It? Everyone has made an encounter with police. Whether it is due to a traffic violation you committed or it being a time when you feared for your life because someone broke into your house. Any time when the police have to get involved in a situation, it is the use of police force. The use of police force is highly important and can make a huge difference in society.
Research indicates that police officers are immensely affected by their daily experience of human indecency and sometimes pain; that dealing with a distrustful and sometimes cruel and hostile public takes its toll on the law enforcement agents. Moreover, that the shift sometimes changes from the long periods of tediousness, and the ubiquitous dangers that are always part of law enforcement work do breed serious job stress (Biggam, et al., 1997). The pressures of policing and law enforcement situate officers at a high risk for high blood pressure, destructive stress hormones, insomnia, heart problems, possible post-traumatic stress