It would also be appropriate to include a statement as to what you learned and how you will apply the knowledge gained in this exercise to real-world situations. The assignment must be formatted according the APA (6th edition) style, which includes a title page and reference page. If you would like to refer to APA samples and tutorials, log into the Ashford Writing Center (USER NAME: ashford; PASSWORD: student). Click on the “ENG122 Resources” tab and review the resources in the “Week 5” section. Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your
He then trounces the argument, saying, “If we use the causal argument at all, all we are entitled to infer is the existence of a cause commensurate with the effect to be explained, the universe, and this does not entitle us to postulate an all-powerful, all-perfect uncaused cause. The most it would entitle one to conclude is that the cause is powerful enough and imperfect enough to have created the sort of world we know.”1 He then states that because the world is imperfect, and because we see a great deal of unnecessary evil, if we reason that there is a creator at all, he must be either “a malevolent powerful being or . . . a well-intentioned muddler.”2 It would seem that Mr. McCloskey assumes that the universe as we know it (with its current defects) must be the world as it was created, without considering the theist’s appeal to special revelation as to why this may be so.
Also, as indicated in the guidelines, you needed to discuss which TCO or textbook topic your project is related to. This will frame your project and provide boundaries for you. You also needed to have in-text parenthetical citations throughout your paper in proper APA format. See the guidelines in the shell and the course project rubric. Good ideas.
Write an ‘Analysis’: Analyze the TECHNIQUES used by the author (‘Language’, ‘Purpose’, ‘Audience’, ‘Mode of Development', etc). By analyzing the writer’s techniques you will be able to answer this basic question: Did the author achieve his/her purpose successfully? Don’t forget to justify your answer by citing evidence from the text. 5. Write a ‘Response’: Respond to the writer’s IDEAS (main idea, first) by evaluating them and pointing out whether or not you agree with any of them.
I will also use the findings from the Williams Institute Ethics Awareness Inventory Assessment also called EAI. The EAI is a learning tool that helps people analyzes ethical perspectives
it is up to you. Please quote freely the writers of the period that you admire or would like to admonish. III. Many of the eighteenth century philosophes were what we would call “educational theorists,” writing works that addressed the education of children, women, as well as theories of learning. For this essay, you are asked to research the educational views of John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Mary Wollstonecraft.
First, furthermore, however, another example, moreover, lastly. 5. Using quotations and referring to the text You MUST use quotations and references to the text in an exam answer. (This forms the Evidence part of the PEE process). You can use quotes in 2 different ways: 1.
- Draw a correlation between the institution and the literary movement. - Provide a secondary citation to support your argument. - Justify use of citation 5. Correlated Literary Works (create an outline for each work applied): - Describe the particular work applied - Address style, content, and author’s purpose - Explain the influence upon/by the institution - Correlate the two through comparison, contrast, or any appropriate connection as you perceive it. - Provide a primary citation from the work to support your argument - Justify use of citation 6.
You should consult the undergraduate handbook/ School guidance booklets on writing assignments and project reports, if needed. It is helpful to write clear and well-structured assignments, where you present your argument lucidly and in an informed manner, with due reference to appropriate theoretical concepts and relevant real life examples. Read around the topic, assess the issues involved, summarise your main points, think of a suitable analytical framework and essay structure, then write your report. Or, to quote Lewis Carroll (Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, Chapter
A guide for critique of research articles Following is the list of criteria to evaluate (critique) a research article. Please note that you should first summarize the paper and then evaluate different parts of it. Most of the evaluation section should be devoted to evaluation of internal validity of the conclusions. Please add at the end a section entitled ''changes in the design/procedures if I want to replicate this study." Attach a copy of the original article to your paper.