Critically Compare the Use of Myth and Analogy to Express Human Understanding.

737 Words3 Pages
Critically compare the use of myth and analogy to express human understanding. An analogy is when we us something that we know to describe or explain something else that we don’t know, while a myth is a story that teaches us to understand something. Mythology is a way of understanding deeper reality, so for instances Greek myth, the stories of Odysseus and Theseus are tales of human searches for certainty and home in a strange world we barely understand. However, the doctrine of analogy developed by Aquinas does enhance our understanding as it holds the balance between “Via Negativa” and “Via Positiva”. Myths could be a mode of understanding as they are used to fill a gap in historical understanding where something is missing. For instance, writers of scriptures created myth to express the beginning of the world as there was lack of historical facts. Meanwhile, Aquinas believing that God is revealed through his creation, points out two types of analogy, analogy of attribution and proportion. Using analogy of attribution, human understanding of God can be enhanced because through looking at his creation, we can attribute certain characteristics to him. Just like how we can deduce something about an artist by looking at his work of art. And this approach to express human understanding is something we possibly do on a daily basis unknowingly, the idea of using evidence to working backwards in order to derive information. And so this approach seems practical. Moreover, through myths we can express a human understanding of God because of the truths they portray and the fact that it takes us closer to the religious nature of belief. And so if poetry is the way to express understanding of a love affair, then perhaps myth in religion is best seen as an expression of the truth of faith to the believer, written from the perspective of faith. But, it seems reasonable to
Open Document