Critical Issue Analysis: Anorexia Nervosa

1725 Words7 Pages
Critical Issue Analysis After reading the selected critical issue, use the following questions to analyze the issue. 1. What are at least two facts presented by each side of the critical issue? Pro · “The eating disorder anorexia nervosa results in the death of between 20-30 patients per year in the UK 1 and death rates internationally are reported to be between 4-20%” (Draper, 2000, p. 33). · “Force-feeding (feeding without consent) has been recognized in the UK by the Mental Health Commission as a legitimate therapy to give under section 63 of the UK Mental Health Act 1983” (Draper, 2000, p. 33). Con · “The DSM-IV-TR indicates that the long-term mortality for individuals with anorexia admitted to university hospitals is 10%; death usually results from the effects of starvation, an electrolyte imbalance, or suicide” (Werth, et al., 2003, p. 43). · “Anorexia is a diagnosable mental condition in both the DSM-IV-TR and the ICD-10” (Werth, et al., 2003, p. 46). 2. What are at least two opinions presented by each side of the critical issue? Pro · “Repeated episodes of force-feeding decrease the chances of long-term recovery and it is doubtful that it is actually in the best interests of a patient to be…show more content…
For example, the author stated, “The aggregate annual mortality rate associated with anorexia nervosa is more than 12 times higher than the annual death rate due to all causes of death for females 15-24 years old in the general population” (Werth, et al., 2003, p. 44). These statistics help the reader gain a better appreciation for the issue. Through providing more appropriate and efficient resources the authors can help the reader understand why the stance taken is so important. The excess of information and the lack of (compared to opposing side) emotions help this paper seem more credible. More facts help the reader believe and respect that stance
Open Document