Crime And Order Maintenance In Celtic And Roman Br

509 Words3 Pages
It is said that the punishment of crime in Britain today shares similarities with Celtic and Roman Britain. The types of crime committed throughout history have on the whole remained the same from theft to murder. Here we will discuss how the Celts and Romans dealt with offenders so we can consider how the same approaches to crime still apply today. A common form of punishment for crime under Celtic law was the imposition of fines to compensate victims. An offender would need a Guarantor to pay his fine should he be unable to pay. If an offender could not pay nor get a Guarantor, he would find himself isolated from his tribe in the lowest caste of society. The lowest caste did not have civil rights and may not have been allowed to participate in some religious rites. Further, an offender would not be allowed to continue with their profession nor work in any position of trust. The Celts would not actually punish an offender nor stand in the way of redemption, in fact this was encouraged but it would be solely down to the offender to earn his way back into his tribe. Belonging to a tribe in Celtic Britain meant everything. Kinship and honour were of utmost importance, so a fear of such isolation and losing religious rites would not only have deterred repeat offending but also stood to deter others from offending. Today, we still use the method of fines as a form of punishment for many offences, where victims can be compensated via the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority. If an offender does not pay his fine, he could ultimately be sent to prison. Alternative punishment could be a reduced fine accompanied by a prescribed number of community service hours which must be carried out for no pay. Prison and community service could be considered comparable to the isolation of living in the lowest caste in Celtic Britain. Like the Celts, today we focus on
Open Document