Constantine The Great: Diocletian

1541 Words7 Pages
Constantine the Great Background Constantine was born in Nassus on February 27, near the year 272. His father was an officer in the Roman Army. Constantine probably spent little time with his father; however, he received a formal education at Diocletian’s court. Constantine became a prominent member of the Diocletian’s court and fought in Asia as well as served in a variety of tribunates. In addition, Constantine returned from the eastern front during the spring of 303 to witness the “Great Persecution” of Christians. In May 305, Diocletian announced his resignation. Many had felt that he would choose Constantine has his successor; however, he was ignored (Lieu 130) Upon the death of his father in 306 Constantine was…show more content…
At a time when four emperors existed, each being paranoid of the other, Constantine would prove himself a mighty ruler. In the west, two emperors held power, Constantine in the northern part of Europe, and Maxentius in the lower part of Europe and North Africa. Maxentius was based out of Rome. Tensions built between the two emperors (Roldanus 89). First, Maxentius’ father had died at the hands of Constantine. Second, Constantine had promised his half sister to Licinius, another emperor in the east, for the purpose of marriage. Maxentius threatened retaliation against Constantine for his father’s death. He also felt threatened by the promised marriage of Constantine’s sister to another emperor. Maxentius chose to have Constantine’s statues in Italy thrown down. Constantine chose to respond quickly (Pohlsander 27). With 40,000 men, he marched toward Rome. He took city after city in Northern Italy. Maxentius refused to respond, staying within the walls of his city. As Constantine approached Rome, the people began to get restless. Maxentius feared an uprising among the people. He also had a superstition that on 28 October an enemy of Rome would be defeated. Because of this superstition, Maxentius chose to face Constantine on the battlefield (Pohlsander…show more content…
This symbol represented his conversion to Christianity and the fact to Constantine that God was with him during the battle at Milvian Bridge. After winning this battle, this was affirmation to Constantine that Christ was in control (Roldanus 45). Whether Constantine converted to Christianity at this time is still controversial. In fact there are those who question his conversion altogether. However, Constantine demonstrated a desire to bring Christianity to the forefront of modern Rome and made changes to improve the lives of Christians (Roldanus 60). Because of this vision, and the policies brought forward, Eusebius saw Constantine as a “messiah” figure. Feeling that God was indeed leading Constantine in all of his military and political endeavors, “Eusebius is careful not to say so directly, the application of the Moses typology to Constantine stands indirect comparison to its earlier use by Eusebius in relation to Christ.” (Cameron 193) Constantine was indeed a careful, thoughtful leader, who never lost a war, even though he was greatly outnumbered in most situations. He survived many assassination plans and attempts on his life. Eusebius saw all of these events as being divinely
Open Document