Conformity And Obiediance

1646 Words7 Pages
Conformity and obedience. Outline and evaluate findings from conformity and obedience research and consider explanations for conformity, as well as evaluating Milgram’s studies of obedience (including ethical issues). Conformity can be seen as a change in behaviour or belief as a result of real or imagined group pressure. Social influence is the process of changing an individual’s attitudes, belief or behaviour by the presence of actions of others. Some forms of social influence is obvious, for example, a teacher asking for a students work to be handed in on time. Other types can be more subtle, unnoticed, and sometimes even unnoticed by those who are influenced. Conformity is a form of major influence, this is because it influences a small group to fit in with the behaviour or opinions of a larger group, Kelman (1958) suggested that there are three types of conformity; Compliance when we change our behaviour to fit in with the majority, Internationalisation when we change our minds about something, because the majority have convinced us they are right, and Identification when we change our beliefs or behaviour, to fit in with a group we admire. Obedience is quite different from conformity, which is about changing behaviour to fit in with the majority. Obedience is to follow direct orders from a perceived figure of authority. There can be a downside to this however, if a figure of authority orders individuals to do something unmoral, such as hurting someone we are likely to obey, even though we know it is wrong. This is called destructive obedience. There have been a number of key psychological studies done into why people conform. Asch’s (1951) aim of his study into majority influence was to see if people would conform to giving an incorrect answer, when the correct answer so obvious and how social influence affected this. Asch took seven
Open Document