Compare And Contrast Paleolithic And Hunter-Gather

419 Words2 Pages
The economic and social structures of the hunter-gatherers during the Paleolithic Age and the urbanized societies differed a substantial amount. Within the Paleolithic Age, hunter-gatherers social structure was based on equality. Both men and females were treated with equal importance, as they were both vital to the livelihood of their bands. The lifestyle of the people of this time restrained them from owning private property. So, with everyone equal there was no need-or possibility- of social distinction. They were required to follow the animals they hunted and search for edible nuts and fruits to sustain them throughout the seasons, by travel. In return, the constant traveling only allowed the people to own few objects like tools or weapons. Property held no meaning within these groups since there was no domesticated animals or plants to cultivate. Since there was no hold on wealth, people were merely judged for ones strength, power, bravery, age and wisdom, and personality. All members of the group contributed equally and everyone was a necessity. There was no distinction between male and female besides the fact that males hunted wild animals and females gathered vegetation. Within these communities, the economy was based on food production for the band to sustain their lives. The bands consisted of about thirty-to-fifty people. The bands only interacted with other groups for marriage partners or agreements on territory. Within urbanized societies, social distinctions were determined based on wealth. The social class system came along with settling and domesticating animals and plants. Rulers of certain cities, such as Mesopotamian city-states, were the head of the class system succeeded by aristocrats, merchants, and then slaves since the development of trade and worldly items. Being born to a family with a certain class distinction gave people certain

More about Compare And Contrast Paleolithic And Hunter-Gather

Open Document