Compare And Contrast Crusades And Jihad

1431 Words6 Pages
The Crusades or Jihad (holy war) between Islamic and the Christian fanatics from 635 to 1588, was outright murder, sanctioned war or just a convenient religious method of getting rid of the opposition supported by the Churches and rulers of the time. I think it really depends on whether you are asking a Christian, or a Muslim, or someone who is an Atheist and a supporter of neither religious group. No matter whom you talk to though you will undoubtedly get a different answer form each. I think the Crusades and Jihad where murderous in nature, in the name of a god who could care a less about land, and if conducted today depending on the country would be considered terrorism. I say that because the United States invaded Iraq for no real solid reason and the world community other than Middle Eastern countries railed around and supported us, however think back when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990. The world did not rally around and support him they wanted him gone. Think back though would the world have stood by and watched if he called it the Kuwait crusades or Jihad to unite their brothers to the south under one…show more content…
The one thing that everyone should take away is maybe no one owns those holy sites that were fought over for centuries, but maybe they belong to all religious groups and should hold enough religious significance, so no matter what you religious affiliation is a person can go there without fear of life. The Pope and the highest-level religious person from each religion should set down and create a state or several states to manage all the holy sites, sort of a coop. Both Christians and Muslims should learn from history and not judge people for whom they were, but who they are. There is no real fundamental reason why the crusades of the past or the crusades of the present had to

More about Compare And Contrast Crusades And Jihad

Open Document