Comparative Critique

1037 Words5 Pages
“Too “Close to the Bone”: The Historical Context for Women’s Obsession with Slenderness” vs. “Rethinking Weight” In the article, “Too Close to the Bone”: The Historical Context for Women’s Obsession with Slenderness,” Roberta Seid, the author, tells of the emotional and life-changing endeavors women have taken on to try and portray the “ideal” body over time. Going as far back as the 115th century, Seid exposes our culture’s ideal body image and how it has changed over time. This article unveils the complexity of striving to be the ideal woman with the ideal body. On the contrary, “Rethinking Weight,” Spake conveys many different views of obesity. Being viewed as prejudice and discrimination, Spake shares the common idea of being overweight, and not losing the weight, is caused by laziness (Spake 284). “Too Close to the Bone” and “Rethinking Weight” both discuss weight issues that deal more with the mind than with the body. However, the articles contrast in the ways that “Rethinking Weight” focuses on the agitation of the medical world. The agitation being if obesity is caused by genetics or if it is a choice, while “Too Close to the Bone” focuses more solely on women and the complexity of the idea that the ideal body is constantly evolving to our society. Thus leading to a similarity in that both articles discuss the effects of the mistaken beliefs fueled by our society and misconceptions of history’s impression of the body. The article, “Too Close to the Bone” complicated an idea shown in “Rethinking Weight” because one believes that a cause of weight problems is mostly genetics. In “Too Close to the Bone” by telling about the trials and physiological demand that society has on women of all ages, Seid discusses whether or not obesity is just a disease. Seid took under consideration many researchers and doctors opinions of this topic. Considering
Open Document