Colonial Differences of the 17th Century

525 Words3 Pages
Colonial Differences of the 17th Century In the mid-1600’s, when the New England and Chesapeake regions first began to colonize, each had the same hopes for the New World. However, by the 1700’s, the two regions varied greatly in spite of both being from England. Physical and cultural differences separated these regions distinctively. And when discussing this alteration between the New England colonies and the Chesapeake region, one must take into account the differences in purpose for colonial settlement and the differences in geography. These said factors led to considerable contrast. The colonists that settled in New England were families of young age. Family plays an important role in religion, and it shows that the colonists were planning to stay in America and form a community shaped around the church (document B). They were, for the most part, highly religious Puritans who wished to avoid religious persecution and wanted religious tolerance. So, they immigrated to America to follow their ideals, which are expressed in Document A. They also tried to set up a democracy to show that religion was more important than money, as seen in Documents D and E. The colonists that settled in the Chesapeake region, however, were not as religious and lacked a similar aim. Document C describes the settlers of Virginia as older single men and a few older women. Based on this information, it can be concluded that the Virginian colonists were not planning on staying long in the New World and they were not there to create a democracy. Their main purpose was to dig gold, wash gold, refine gold, load gold, and they would treat the other colonials as slaves to get it (document F). This way of life was quite the opposite of the New England colonies. The geography of the New England colonies was not incredibly forgiving. The soil was heavily glaciated and rocky,
Open Document