Client Centred Therapy

2246 Words9 Pages
Evaluate the claim that person-centred therapy offers the therapist all that he/she will need to treat clients. In order to provide an evaluation of person-centred therapy in relation to the question above, it is first necessary to provide a brief overview of its main features, followed by a critique both for and against its uses. Throughout this essay I will use the terms client-centred and person-centred therapy interchangeably. Person-centred therapy is associated predominantly with the work of Carl Rogers, who advocated a non-directive approach to treatment. In its purest form this means simply providing a safe space for the client to visit where they can talk about anything they wish to. The therapist’s role is merely to listen to the client. Brodley suggests that “The client-centred therapist does not usually take a history … does not ask leading or probing questions, does not volunteer interpretations or explanations about the client to the client…”. The therapist is merely empathetic, congruent, nonjudgemental and honest. He should possess and utilise all these skills in an unconditional manner. Rogers argues that by providing no guidance, diagnosis or suggestion the client will be able to provide their own treatment plan; he suggests that by providing guidance or suggestion the therapist would be shaping their own will, thoughts and identity on the client rather than allowing them the freedom to make their own decisions in therapy and its direction. He suggests a nondirective and therefore unbiased approach totally driven by the client. Rogers further suggests using several cases as examples that transference – whereby the client transfers feelings (pain, hate, lust, etc.) from themselves to the therapist – is actually a useful tool in allowing the client to come to an eventual self-realisation of what they are actually feeling. Person-centred

More about Client Centred Therapy

Open Document