Cja 313 Contemporary Issues Prison Privatization

2038 Words9 Pages
The purpose of this paper is to assess the past, present, and future implications of prison privatization as they relate to the criminal justice system. This paper will include predictions and recommendations that need to be addressed for private prisons to be successful. A good place to start when discussing public and private prisons is to have a clear understanding of what differences exist. A public prison is run by the local, state, or federal government. The government is in control of how the prisons are run and ensure the safety of the individuals housed within the prison and society. The government hires a private company to design, build and manage a private prison. The company is running the prison intending to make a profit. The government pays the company a daily per diem rate for each inmate. The more inmates the private prison houses and the longer the sentence, the more money the company will receive from the government. The government is responsible to ensure the prisoners constitutional rights are not violated in either type of prison. The government has no control over how the private prisons are operated. Privatization is removing the government from the business altogether. Private prisons are not a new concept, but rather just beginning to reappear after many years. Private prisons began in the mid 1800s when the penny-pinching legislatures awarded contracts to private entrepreneurs to operate and manage the first state prison in Louisiana, the Auburn penitentiary, and the Sing Sing penitentiary (Smith, 1993). Later in the century these prisons became the models of the privatized prison system throughout the nation (Smith, 1993). During this time, privatization was different from today. Privatization during this period was states leasing or contracting convict labor to private companies. Texas took the privatization to a new level by

More about Cja 313 Contemporary Issues Prison Privatization

Open Document