Child Left Behind Act Failure

5452 Words22 Pages
No Child Left Behind Act: Educational Epiphany or Epic Failure Amanda Phillips Western Governors University No Child Left Behind Act: Educational Epiphany or Epic Failure No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was designed by the Bush administration to reduce the "learning gap" between different groups of students and to ensure better teacher equality. However, it sets forth a method of measuring "Adequate Yearly Progress" which aims at 100% proficiency in 10 years time (from the start of the program) (CEP, 2004). As schools struggle to meet the act's impossibly high goals, many incentives to keep underperforming students out, or to hold those already in the school back present themselves. The primary objective…show more content…
In order to accomplish the goals and objectives of this act, states were required to follow strict guidelines in the mandates to implement this policy and meet the requirements in order to receive the authorized funding appropriated by Congress. As an illustration the purpose was to be accomplished by ensuring that high-quality academic assessments, accountability systems, teacher preparation and training, curriculum, and instructional materials are aligned with challenging State academic standards so that students, teachers, parents and administrators can measure progress against common expectations for student academic achievement… authorized appropriations to local educational agencies to improve children’s literacy through school libraries, ensure education of migratory children, set up prevention and inventions programs for at risk children… for example, youth who are neglected and delinquent, set up programs for the preventions of school dropout… to improve schools an academic assessment is achieved through adequate yearly progress (in order) to meet the State’s student academic achievement standards required by the law… (Additionally), Armed forces recruiters may have access to students and students recruiting information under the General…show more content…
A number of states have not been able to meet the mandates required to implement this act have questioned the Federal government’s role in educational reform which was traditionally barred by the 10th Amendment from interfering in matters that are strictly within the control of state and local government. Since the Federal government has no constitutional authority to be involved in educational affairs then why had President Bush, taken so much interest in the education of the targeted population identified in the act and is this interests due partly to self interest, the interest of stakeholders or a responsibility ensure that no child is left behind in the American educational system? Further federal intrusion raises many other serious political questions about democracy in the American government and its peoples’ as it relate to shared and divided
Open Document