Attachment Theory Essay

387 Words2 Pages
The psychology of attachment In this essay we will look at Attachment Theory. What is Attachment and Attachment Behaviour? We will look at the work of both John Bowlby, who is responsible for many of the core concepts of Attachment Theory, and Mary Ainsworth, who developed and extended Bowlby’s theory. We examine the consequences of attachment types in later life. We will also consider criticisms of attachment such as Cultural Differences and the Social Co nstructionist view of attachment. Finally we review the effects of short and long term separation and privation. Bowlby believed Attachement Theory attempted to explain both Attachment and Attachment Behaviour.(1997, p38) ‘Attachment may be defined as an affectional tie that one person or animal forms between himself and another specific one – a tie that binds them together in space and endures over time.’(Richards, 1974, p100) And ‘[a]ttachment behaviour is any form of behaviour that results in a person attaining or maintaining proximity to some other dearly identified individual who is conceived as better able to cope with the world.’(Bowlby, 1988, pp. 25-26) Psychologists are particularly attracted to the bond that develops between a child and their primary carer as strong and secure attachments are generally formed in the first two years of life. John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth are the people most responsible for Attachment Theory. Bowlby devised the basic principles of attachment theory and these remain the dominant opinion in psychology today. The following may be considered as the four main areas of his theory. 1) Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis; 2) The Evolutionary Basis of Attachment; 3) Social Releasers and Instinctive Parenting Responses; and 4) Internal Working Models. (Jarvis, 2001, p23) Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis ‘declared that a child requires the continuous presence of a primary
Open Document