Archetypal Criticism Of Kubla Khan

2677 Words11 Pages
An Archetypal Criticism of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s KUBLA KHAN or A Vision In A Dream A Fragment by Anamika Deb Roy M.Phil Semester 1 Course 1: Research Methodology Course Supervisors : Dr. Anisur Rehman and Dr. Ameena Kazi Ansari Jamia Millia Islamia Department of English Archetypes and their Significance in Literary Criticism In literary criticism the term archetype denotes the recurrent narrative design, patterns of action, character types, themes, and images which are identifiable in a wide variety of works of literature, as well as in myths, dreams, and even social rituals. Such recurrent items are held to be the result of elemental and universal forms or patterns in the human psyche, whose effective embodiment in a literary work evokes a profound response from the reader, because he shares the archetypes expressed by the author. An important antecedent of the literary theory of archetype was the treatment of the myth by a group of comparative anthropologists at Cambridge University, especially James G. Frazer, whose “The Golden Bough“ (1890-1915) identified elemental patterns of myth and ritual that, he claimed, recur in legends and ceremonials of diverse and far-flung cultures and religions. An even more important antecedent was the depth psychology of Carl

More about Archetypal Criticism Of Kubla Khan

Open Document