Allurements that make Science Dangerous

1205 Words5 Pages
Allurements that make Science Dangerous Should Scientist be considered geniuses or madmen? In today’s society they tend to be labeled one or the other. When we think genius, most think of Albert Einstein. He was known for his theory of relativity and specifically mass-energy equivalence, E = mc2. Einstein received the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect.” On the other hand, Frankenstein is the ideal example of the madman. In the novel, Frankenstein, Mary Shelly gives the prefect examples of how science can make one feel like a genius when in fact they have to tendency of a madman. Dr. Frankenstein states that “I was surprised, that among so many men of genius who had directed their inquires toward the same science, that I alone should be reserved to discover so astonishing a secret.” Even though Frankenstein sees himself as a genius, others may view him as a madman obsessed with the power that only God should hold, the creation of life. Shelly argues in Frankenstein, that science can be dangerous and problematic because it is enticing, empowering, and destructive. Shelly suggests science is dangerous because of the enticing discovery of creation, striving for the ability to interchange death to life. She shows this enticement by Dr. Frankenstein’s utter infatuation with his occupation, he finds himself “engaged, heart and soul, in the pursuit of some [new] discoveries.” Shelly displays the thought of science to be problematic when Dr. Frankenstein confesses that “I knew well, therefore, what would be my father’s feelings; but I could not tear my thoughts from my employment, loathsome in itself, but which had taken an irresistible hold of my imagination.” Shelly shows that Dr. Frankenstein is so enticed by the thought of restoring life upon the dead, that he
Open Document