Adam Smith Stages

2449 Words10 Pages
“Four Stages of Progress and Fear of Decay: The Intellectual Atmosphere of the Age of Enlightenment” The 17th and 18th centuries (1600s and 1700s) saw huge changes throughout the Western world. A “Scientific Revolution” occurred and science began to dominate most intellectuals’ thoughts. This started in the late 16th century and spread and grew throughout the 17th and 18th centuries. Major changes that led to this revolution included the development of new methods of observation and data collection and advances in printing which made it easier for scientists to share their work. Empiricism became the buzzword as more and more people began to agree that things must be observed in order to be understood. Many fields of science were…show more content…
He called for the government to take a “hands off” role in economics (“laissez faire”). In essence, he tried to apply the natural liberty idea to economics. His idea was that what is good for the individual will be good for society because laws of supply and demand will work out naturally through an “invisible hand.” He argued that government has a place in the judiciary, the military, and the policing system but not in the economy. A less-studied, though also important, aspect of Smith’s thinking was his view of history and his attempt to apply scientific observation to history. He and others in the Scottish leg of the Enlightenment came up with the idea that history progresses in four distinct stages: 1) hunting 2) pasturage 3) agriculture and 4) commerce. They believed that societies progressed through these stages as they grew in population and needed to find new ways to subsist. The catch, however, was that once they reached the final stage, decay and decadence became inevitable. (We’ll talk much more about this in our discussion of the McCoy book.) Finding American Indians in the first 3 stages helped to reinforce this theory, and by the time of the Revolution many Americans began to see breaking away from England as a way to avoid the decay and decadence stage and preserve a really good overall political system. (A good “Informal Discussion” would be to look up the Scottish…show more content…
Other Europeans, especially the French, really liked the new empiricism and the idea of English liberties embodied in the Bill of Rights. One French intellectual, Voltaire, tried to spread empiricism and religious toleration further. He introduced the idea that most inhumane crimes are committed in the name of religion, and he ridiculed superstition and the French witch trials. He spent time in England and fell in love with its political system, especially the idea of freedom of speech. (If anyone who has taken the “Age of Enlightenment” with Dr. Smith, or who is just interested in this subject, wants to tell us more about Voltaire on the “Informal Discussion” board, please feel free.) Another French intellectual, Montesquieu, also greatly admired the English government after the Glorious Revolution. His favorite aspect was its balance of executive, legislative, and judicial powers (“balance of powers” with “checks and balances”). Finally, Rousseau focused on the idea of society as corrupting and said that people lived under a social contract and needed few social constraints. He also said that law should be made by the “general will” of the
Open Document