2.) Unrestricted access to master files could allow fraud by letting employees to change information to hide theft. 3.) An organization could lose important information if a backup and recovery plan is not in place. 4.)
The purpose also is if law enforcement was to take the evidence it would not be used in the court of law unless issue or that person can be set free of all charges. Basically one wrong moved can make us lose a suspect of a horrible crime if we are not careful. Law enforcement just need to be cautious so they are doing their jobs correct, and setting a person free will get them into trouble (cjlf.org, 2011). When we are identifying the exclusionary rule it is a great rule to have so police have to stop and think. Police have to think before they search because it could cost them a lot if they just do what they want.
Although police officers stand for peace, there are many countries where people view police not as the hero but as the villain. Even in safe, developed countries like Canada and the United States, acts of police misconduct have occurred. For these reasons, police officers should not be allowed to carry firearms. Eliminating guns won’t eliminate police misconduct; however it will take some power away from them but that can be good because they will also be gaining power this way. It sounds confusing but when people see a man with a gun, no matter what side of the law he is on, they will get intimidated and possibly fear him.
They will withhold critical evidence from the defense team and will resort to immoral if not illegal tactics in their investigation of the offense. Their personal opinion is that they actually do not care if the defendant is guilty or innocent, they just want a conviction. They want to extract their pound of flesh. Also researchers have determined that some of the causes of prison overcrowding are harsher penalties for criminal activities, changes to laws that make new actions illegal, high recidivism rates and needed improvements to the penal system. Once the causes of crowding have been fixed researchers can begin to address the problems it causes and deal with them.
Also, technology and managerial efforts’ failures are conceivable and it can be crucial in certain circumstances. Similarly, judges’ plan for placing yard signs is somewhat raise negative signal in the criminals, who wants to overcome his guilt. As a result, he would isolate himself from the society, and which in turn will produce negative outcomes. Then again, for the public safety, it is necessary to ratify different security mechanism despite the presence of moral and legitimate issues. So, it would be healthy to trace and map criminal’s residence to avoid potential threats of
This proves that there is almost no defined difference between cyber bullying and regular bullying, so it should be handled as if it were regular bullying. It would be extremely difficult to prosecute a cyber bully because it would be similar to trying to prosecute someone for regular bullying and it is not fair to arrest someone for plainly bothering someone. If someone were to convict a cyber bully they would have to deal with the questions, how does one know what another's intentions are? How does one prove to others what they are? In the case of harassment, the act of harassing or annoying someone, the Supreme Court has ruled that the term annoy is too
The most common motives usually involved in financial fraud are greed and financial hardship. However, without opportunity the fraud would not take place. This is why it is important to have internal policies and controls in place for deterring opportunity (Wells, 2001). It is also vital to detect fraud; once an individual has detected fraudulent activity it is easier to see where controls can be placed to deter the activity. Who commits Fraud?
Criminals especially those who are going through court proceedings may not feel comfortable disclosing certain information to someone they know to be a researcher. Typically most researchers are similar to police in characteristics, white and middle class, so acting covertly will most likely increase comfortability between the researcher and criminals, allowing more valid research to be acquired. Similarly judges and police may alter their behaviours if they know the researchers true identity in a bid to disguise any flaws in their practices and unjustified law enforcing. However, Positivists would argue that data collected by covert observations aren’t at all valid, they are biased as they are based off of the observer’s interpretations. This could be especially true in the case of researching court proceedings as it is unlikely many researchers have gone through one themselves.
However, sometimes these citizens expect special favors from the police such as extra patrols or not receiving tickets or charges for minor offenses. Gratuities may also lead some police officers to have a sense of entitlement from citizens. These officers may begin demanding gratuities from business owners (Walker & Katz, 2011). When an officer participates in a minor form of corruption, his or her moral integrity becomes compromised. That officer becomes susceptible to more serious types of corruption.
Another randomly selected person is brought in to replace the disqualified person, so it is a gamble when challenging jurors. • Jurors do not have a time limit when reaching a verdict. This is harmful and unjust to the accused if they are in remand waiting for their verdict, and may be not guilty. If jurors can’t reach a majority verdict, it is called a ‘hung jury’. Case is then dismissed and a retrial occurs.