A Tale of Two Coaches

578 Words3 Pages
Jennifer Nancarrow Grand Canyon University: LDR 600 Case Study Analysis Paper: A Tale of Two Coaches November 26, 2014 The leadership perspectives that were discussed in Week 1 that is manifested with both coaches is “Intelligence/Intellectual: ability is positively related to leadership. Studies have indicated that leaders are affiliated with these traits. “In any leadership position, one must possess both intellectual as well as emotional intelligence”. Intelligence gives the leader the knowledge and reasoning abilities make decisions, problem solve and develop a vision for the future” (Northhouse. P.G. 2013). Intelligence and Intellectual perspectives were both demonstrated from Coach K and Coach Knight. You need to have these traits to build a team, raise a team, compete, and win. The power bases that Coach K relied upon were Personal Power: expert. He was an expert in his 25 years coaching. He achieved these from his personal experiences of skill and knowledge of the game. The power bases that Coach Knight relied upon were Formal Power: legitimate. He had a position of power in the basketball organization, and his players recognized his authority. Coach K’s actions were more aligned with a leadership role. He took the time to know each of his players; he greeted each and every one of them. He did not want to be a manager or a dictator; he wanted to be a leader. His leadership style was ongoing, adjustable, flexible, and dynamic. He wanted to get inside his players heads and understand where the player was coming from. He wanted to help his players get to where they all needed to be as a team. He cared for players; they were like family to him. Coach Knight’s actions were more aligned with a managerial role. He was nicknamed “The General” He had the will to win, and nothing in his tracks was going to stop him, even if he had a stunning list of

More about A Tale of Two Coaches

Open Document