Should Britain adopt a codified constitution? Should the UK have a codified constitution? A constitution is a set of rules that establishes how political power should be distributed, the relationship between political institutions, the limits to government, the rights of citizens and how the constitution can be changed. In the UK, we have an uncodified constitution; this means that it is not written down on one single document. However, recently more and more people have become in favour of codifying the constitution.
Parliament supremacy means that a legislative body is supreme to all other government institutions, including any executive or judicial bodies. Generally, the courts cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change. It is very much evidenced that parliament is supreme in the UK, the only question is, is it losing its supremacy, if so to what extent? Parliamentary sovereignty is the most important part of the UK constitution, it has been for a very long time. The UK is known to have an unwritten constitution, however, although, they do not exist in a single text, like other countries e.g.
The Unwritten constitutions principal source is statue law, I.e., laws passed by the UK parliament but also includes; Acts of Parliament/Statutes, Conventions, Common Law, European Treaties, Works of authority and Traditions. Unlike the U.S.A in which it claims its constitution and reason for existence is to allow the American citizens have “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” On the other hand, the main reasons of UK constitution are establish the principles on which the constitution is based, establish the distribution of power within a political system, define and limit government power, set the territory that comes under the jurisdiction of the government, set out the methods of amending the constitution. etc Constitutions are designed to set out the rules and regulations within which governments operate. Tomas Paine said, “Government without a constitution is power without right.” Codified constitutions like America and Korea are largely written centered around a single
It can further be separated into codified and uncodified. An uncodified constitution is a constitution which has not been written down in a single document in an organised form. An uncodified constitution is partly written and unwritten but cannot be found in a single form. For example the UK has an uncodified constitution, the constitution cannot be found in a single form. Uncodified constitutions tend not to be entrenched therefore short term amendments can be made which might have negative impacts on citizens.
QUESTION: What rules would you use to interpret the Constitution? A Constitution of a state refers to the basic and fundamental principles which the inhabitants of the state consider to be essential for their governance and well being.  A Constitution lays down political and other state institutions and distributes powers among them and puts limitations on the exercise of those powers. In most countries, the fundamental laws of the land are contained in one document or a series of documents for which the word ‘Constitution’ is reserved, but in a few countries like the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, there is no single document which embraces all these rules or which can be referred to specifically as the Constitution of the state. Nevertheless, such countries have Constitutions because the word ‘constitution’ is a legal expression which identifies all the elements of how a country is organised and governed.
Almost all of the electorate are permitted to vote (a broad franchise), and elections are held freely and fairly, and are subject to scrupulous scrutiny in order to ensure this. This means that the people’s votes should represent their opinions as truly and fairly as is possible. However, these votes, whilst being fair themselves, are not always directly or precisely proportional to the power that is bestowed upon their choice. The First Past The Post system is not a system of proportional representation, as it is a single member, simple plurality system and thus could not be. Whilst this system has many positives (it creates much stronger governments than other alternatives, for example), it is not as representative as other systems, and, because of its single member constituencies, it can lead to a lack of social and political representation.
“How would you define the term Politics? Why do you think Politics is necessary in British Society?” The term “Politics” is impossibly hard to define. However my interpretation would be that Politics is a social science which dominates the world as we know it today; it is the governing of social situations most commonly used in countries in the attempt to gain authority and power. It is also the study of government, how a country is controlled and past and current affairs. Politics has many topical undertones such as religion, class, race and gender.
Assess the strenghts of the British constitution?- Marked essay with teacher feedback (25 Marks) A constitution is a set of rules relating to how a state is to be governed and organised. The primary function of a constitution is to provide legitimacy to those in power; however it also defines the limits of government power, protects freedom and distributes power within the political system. As such it could be said that due to the UK having an uncodified constitution there are many strengths and weaknesses, such as flexibility and adaptability, conservative pragmatism, executive power and domination and many more which will be further spoken about below. Some of these help to make the UK constitution a better one than other countries like the USA who have to stick to their constitution. A strength of Britain having an uncodified constitution is that its unentrenched nature is flexible and adaptable therefore easy to amend, meaning that the government is not limited with their ability to change governing arrangements by having to go through a lengthy and complex and procedure.
 In essence, its right to make laws and regulations causes individuals in the political community to obey. Obedience to the state is perhaps then understood as prerequisite to citizenship. Nonetheless, the sovereign body is limited by the natural rights of citizens.  Over recent decades, the issue of a duty of obedience to the law has been brought up. In the context of political theory, the issue of disobedience to the state requires careful analysis.
On the other hand, a regime which is also commonly known as a political system, is a “system of rule”. Thus can be viewed as an ideology where it is a form of governing. Although a military regime crops to mind when thinking of political systems, we must also remember there are other types of regimes, i.e. Tyranny, Oligarchy, democracy, monarchy, aristocracy etc. Moreover this essay will highlight the key differences between these two, which are .... Pp 26, andrew Heywood, Politics , pp 335, barrie Axford, an introduction to politics second edition First main difference between government and regime is how they are changed, in terms of how a government i.e.