Validity, Credibility, and Reliability Some reasons I might consider data or information to lack validity, credibility, or reliability are if the information has come from an untrusted site, if the evidence does not support the topic, the information that I already know about the topic is contradicting, and if there are no sources for where the information came from. A perfect example of information or data that my lack validity, credibility, and reliability is the information that is given through Wikipedia. Wikipedia offers a lot of information and is usually at the top of search lists, but they information that they provide can be altered and changed by anyone, thus causing the information to lack validity, credibility, and reliability. I do not use Wikipedia what so ever, because I do not know if the person relying information is an expert in that area, or a person that just happens to know a little about the topic I am addressing. Validity, credibility, and reliability can also be compromised if the source brings about any kinds of bias.
It is best to retain a copy of the materials cited as sources in the submitted document. Links to cited documents could sometimes become unavailable for retrieval before a paper is completed. It also might be helpful to use the document copies to support the conclusions in a submitted paper. Documentation is an important aspect of developing a good investigation file. Textbooks are not appropriate references for this purpose.
It is best to retain a copy of the materials cited as sources in the submitted document. Links to cited documents could sometimes become unavailable for retrieval before a paper is completed. It also might be helpful to use the document copies to support the conclusions in a submitted paper. Documentation is an important aspect of developing a good investigation file. Textbooks are not appropriate references for this purpose.
Beef consumers have an uninformed idea that all the beef they are eating is pure and healthy for you. Consumers are trying to feel safer by ignoring certain facts, but it is putting them in danger. Willed ignorance can cause more harm than good. It is a strategy of avoidance. Fast food and beef production industries want consumers to be willfully ignorant of different aspects of the beef production.
The second of Hume’s points is that the causal principle is doubtful. His evidence for this is that we can conceive of things without a cause therefore things without a cause are possible this is also backed up by Mackie who says that the causal principle has no evidence and only exists in a methodological sense. However this argument also has severe faults that discredit it. If the arguments from causality are questionable then that means that the arguments from conceivability are questionable as well. This could also mean that a logically necessary truth could be conceived as false if you don’t completely understand it.
As for the procedures in the article itself, there seems to be an over-reliance on anecdotal evidence, with the argument being supported with stories about one person or with hypothetical situation. There is a distinct lack of hard data, but as the author acknowledges that there is a need for more empirical research, this should not necessarily be taken against her. Furthermore, this article is a part of a mini-series dealing with this topic and
Off labeling can mean that the drug is used for a different condition than intended for, given in a different way, or given a different dosage than what is written on the drug label. This action is lawful throughout the United States and in several other countries. A rare exception to this legality would be a highly addictive narcotic such as morphine. These drugs cannot be lawfully prescribed unless done by officially approved purposes (American Cancer Society). Once a company’s drug has passed this part of the process by showing that the drug is helpful and safe (Consumer Reports Best Buy Drugs 1), they have to create a drug label.
However, this may be the proper thing to do, but let’s face it… it’s not happening that way. We know this because there have been times when we searched for information and depending on which site you are referencing the information will be different. So that tells us that someone is not inputting the proper information. When searching the Internet for information it is best to use creditable sites. Most government sites will have safe and correct information to use.
Date Effects of Goat Meat on the Human Brain There have been several myths and scientific theories in relation to the consumption of some livestock delicacies particularly goat meat. Most of the Western cultures are currently desisting from the consumption of such delicacies, due to diseases that accompany animal meat. consequently, Africans and Middle East countries are just getting brainwashed about the whole livestock keeping and rearing, not only for commercial purposes, but also by the notion of the value derived from such delicacies. Yasminal …particular focus on the Nigerian population reveals that they consider the goat meat, “Ngwo-Ngwo” as one of their traditional meals, whose mythical value spreads from being curative to expanding mental capabilities, whether such beliefs are facts is yet to be confirmed ( p 1731). In my community,in Kenya, superstitions about goat eating come from weird,wild, and imaginative myths.
In addition, type 3 studies are subject to implementation, history, maturation, attitude of subjects, regression, and testing threats. . The Weaknesses of Causal-Comparative Research: There are three major limitations of causal-comparative research. These include, (a) lack of control or the inability to manipulate independent variables methodologically, (b) the lack of power to assign subjects randomly to groups and (c) the danger of inappropriate interpretations. The lack of randomization, manipulation, and control factors make it difficult to establish cause-and-effect relationships with any degree of confidence.