The Grapes of Wrath vs. Crash

368 Words2 Pages
Works of Art such as music, poetry, movies, books, etc. are some of the most brilliant and beautiful ways to convey a powerful message. Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath and one of my personal favorite movies, Crash, both explore the qualities of a particular social issue in depth. Characterization is one of the most profound ways in which both Steinbeck and director Paul Haggis portray their potent message of social issues. Steinbeck shows the everyday struggles that migrants were encompassing during the depression through all sorts of characters. He uses the Joad family’s journey as representation of the hardships a family during the dust bowl may have endured. As the Joads travel, they come across lucrative people such as the police officer, and the car dealer, who try to take advantage of them because they are a part of the poor, lower class. In Steinbeck’s general chapters, we meet other characters such as Mae in chapter fifteen, who judges the tattered farmer who walks in beseeching a loaf of bread, based on the fact that he was part of the lower class. The 2004 best picture awarded film Crash, also sets out to depict and examine racial tensions, and the distance between strangers through character’s interactions with each other. Jean Cabot is an upper class white woman with an abundance of wealth, but has racial tension when her car is stolen. Anthony is a low class African American who lives off the modicum amount of money he receives for stealing cars and turning them into a car shop for money. Through the actions and beliefs of these two characters and many other characters, the whole movie intertwines within itself based on the judgments that total strangers place upon each other. Just as The Grapes of Wrath illustrated social issues of judgment and poverty that took place many years prior to today, it is sad to say that we still face many
Open Document