The Failure Of Washington Mutual

986 Words4 Pages
{text:bookmark-start} The Failure of Washington Mutual {text:bookmark-end} It was the biggest news of the 21st century. Some of us could not believe it had happened, at least not in our lifetime. It had. One of our major banking institutions had failed. What happened? The goal of this paper is to discuss how specific organizational behavior theories could have predicted the failure of Washington Mutual. This writing will also contain a comparison and contrast of how leadership, management, and organizational structures contributed to the failure of the organization. Brief Organization History From its humble beginnings in 1889, Washington Mutual then known as Washington National Building Loan and Investment struggled to develop. Its initial struggles revolved around dues and fees, restricted withdrawals, and high share prices. Throughout the years, there were a series of acquisitions and mergers that caused Washington Mutual to emerge. In the 1990s, Kerry Kellinger took over as Chief Executive Officer. He pursued more mergers making Washington Mutual a giant in mortgage and consumer lending until 2008. Company Demise In September 2008, customers started withdrawing deposits from the bank. These actions took place after Lehman Brothers had filed for bankruptcy protection. The banking system in the country was in a state of flux causing many Americans to get leery of the system. In a matter of 10 days, customers had withdrawn a total of $16.7 billion in deposits according to the Office of Thrift Supervision (Sidel, Enrich, & Fitzpatrick, 2008). The Office of Thrift Supervision and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation seized the operations of the bank and sold it to its only bidder, J. P. Morgan. Organizational Behavior Theory Predictions The demise of Washington Mutual could have been predicted when in 2007 the institution started struggling when
Open Document