Staples Vs Clegg

1493 Words6 Pages
Overall both Robert Staples and Roger Clegg have pretty interesting views on Affirmative action. Both men established points that of course contradict each other, but in other words carry a vast amount of knowledge. Robert Stables, Black Deprivation-White Privilege: The Assault on Affirmative Action, exemplifies every view that would agree that Affirmative Action is needed to achieve racial equality in the United States. Staples announce that many of us in a way are “perplexed”, and that the image of black people has altered into a true characteristic of a not only criminal, but as inadequate. On the other hand Clegg is proclaiming that affirmative action should be appointed everywhere or in this case “employment preferences.” Clegg undergoes…show more content…
Countering that Staples undermines Clegg by stating “In reality, most people in this country are capable of performing well at a variety of occupations, because most of what they learn, in the performing occupational tasks, is on the job itself.” Regardless of the amount of experience you have most of what you learn is basically of which what you are taught no matter what your race, gender, beliefs, and much more. Staples opinion on affirmative action sticks solidly to the views that I withhold. Many times we don’t realize that a lot of things we learn are simply things taught by not only by the people or things around us, but in a way things are often taught by ourselves. Imagine making a mistake, and the only person facing any type of consequence is you. In hindsight we always see ourselves not always doing the right thing, but once we learn from our mistakes things are much easier. Creatively that relates a lot to the workplace in due to Affirmative Action. Courtney Bowie, a senior staff attorney with the American…show more content…
Clegg strongly believes that “…programs are no longer necessary because African Americans, and the other members of ‘protected classes’ have made sufficient progress.” Clegg is clearly illuminating the fact that he sees things from one view. Though the protected classes have truly indeed grew from the time of slavery, and or rights against women; there’s still much that hasn’t been done. Clegg is making a claim in which everyone has truly made it far, but even though they’ve made it further than what they were they haven’t reached the pinnacle in which they’ve been trying to reach for years. To stop something now that has been a success would create an apostolic epidemic. Meanwhile, Staples and his theory that “….the notion of a color blind society, with no need for affirmative action, is a fantasy at this point,” may be a little inaccurate. Though it seems as though affirmative action may last forever there may be a time in which Clegg is correct. There may just be a time when things other than being qualified just will not matter anymore. The color of your skin, and the masculine or feminine way that we carry ourselves will only be an asset that we carry, and our knowledge will be of which we possess. In the Postscript there was valid point about how Staples “…proponents of affirmative action policies must confront the fact that these programs are not applied properly in
Open Document