In addition, some people may give false information, which is why some researchers like to stick to interviews and experiments for increased accuracy. Positivists favour questionnaires, as they tend to be reliable. They are also representative so it can be easy to generalise in most cases. However, questionnaires present a range of practical issues that can affect the reliability. For example, with postal questionnaires the researcher cannot be sure whether the respondent has actually received the questionnaire.
This means that to overcome this barrier a translator would have to be used. This is an effective way to overcome this barrier because it means that the service user can clearly understand what is been said by the service provider and about any medical conditions and treatment can be discussed thoroughly. In addition, non-verbal communication could be used to help create a further understanding of what is being said. Another barrier that prevents communication from becoming effective is background noise. This is simple to overcome as closing windows and doors to prevent outside noises from interfering or by moving to a different area would solve this problem and allow communication to continue effectively.
Questionnaires are valued by positivists for allowing to establish cause and effect relationships while interpretivist see them as the least valuable method of research. Primarily, one of the main practical disadvantages is the low response rate. In Shere Hite’s research in 1991 on ‘love, passion and emotional violence the response rate was only 4.5. Given this low figure, the excruciating importance of drawing generalisations is lost. The research is, therefore, unrepresentative of interests of wider population.
This approach makes it easier to acquire candid facts from participants without preplanned questions or theoretical views. The central phenomenon is distinctly declared in the research question. The research framework was related to the research question and the type of information desired (Houser, 2015). The interview allows participants the chance to explain their experiences and views. This method evaluated the participant’s perception of his or her
The main difference is that in the interview, the questions are read out and the answers are filled in by a trained interviewer rather than by the interviewee. There are many practical advantages for the use of a structured interview for example training interviewers is relatively straightforward and inexpensive, since all they really required to do is follow a set of instructions. Moreover surveys that use structured interviews can cover quite large numbers of people with relatively limited resources because they are quick and fairly cheap to administer. Structured interviews are suitable for gathering straightforward factual information such as a person's job or age. Finally the results are easily quantified
In society standardized testing has many advantages. One advantage to standardized testing is that it does exactly what the name says: it makes everything the same. This way of testing gives the testers a completely equal way to analyze people for many different things. Standardized testing is considered more just because questions are not asked in ways that could hinder people due to race, economic standing or other variables. Standardized testing is also beneficial when it comes to testing a group as a whole to see different statistics within the group.
These individuals are often ridiculed, segregated, and discriminated against. “Some believe that psychological conditions are not as important as physiological conditions or that they are non-biological therefore treatment is ineffective” (Roman et al, 2008). If mental disorders are not properly diagnosed and treated, mental illnesses
Can you tell who’s more convincing at this point? Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus’s essay is more convincing than Mike Rose’s essay because the Organization of their essay is easy to follow and understand their position and argument, the evidence to support their argument is from their own institution studies and interviews, unlike Mike Rose’s evidence, which includes his personal life experience to support his argument, last but not least, Hacker and Dreifus’s essay was more about them being concerned of other people’s education. The purpose of organizing one’s essay is to prevent confusion with what others have said, to what the author is saying. The first half of Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus essay involves their argument. The second half is the examples that support their argument.
Another advantage is that the data is more likely to be valid than for example a questionnaire, as it allows the participant to respond however they want. For these reasons interpretivists generally favour interviews as they are more suited to find meanings, values, attitudes and beliefs. Interviews also allow flexibility so if the interviewer feels it is appropriate, the questions can go slightly off-track although this would only occur in an informal interview. Interviews also allow the researcher to be more sensitive towards the respondent, particularly if it is a sensitive topic area. They can do this by building trust, taking more time over the interview and giving them extra support during and after the interview process.
This means that the research is more detailed and in depth, but is also more valid. Theoretical issues include reliability, meaning can the researcher trust the information that they have collected. The validity means that it is correct and has no mistakes therefore it can be trusted to use in secondary research. Research bias is when the researcher has their own views on the topic therefore they could incorporate their own thoughts into the research. This could all affect the research as it means that it could affect the final result.