Rhetorical Analysis Of Naturalfoodnews.Com Article

970 Words4 Pages
Okay the FDA is evil. So…Anything else? By now you’ve likely heard about carcinogens and how they can potentially lead to cancer. (Of course, none of us really understand how). Still, it makes perfect sense that there are those among us who succumb to the same regurgitated information on msn-health everyday, who would be outraged upon hearing that the FDA has just now condemned the use of Arsenic in chicken feed. Mike Smith in his article “FDA finally admits chicken meat contains cancer-causing arsenic”, discusses the FDA’s inconsistent stances and actions regarding arsenic, but he also tries to factor in other situations where the FDA showed carelessness, (or greediness, as implied by Smith). He uses manipulative strategies to convince us of the danger at hand. By firmly establishing the FDA as an enemy of the common people, he appeals to our ethos. Consistently refers to arsenic as a dangerous carcinogen, he takes advantage of the fear the word can induce. His attempts to do all these things are however, easily dissectible upon investigation. Smith immediately establishes the FDA as a common enemy in the title of the essay. He uses the predicate “finally admits” to make it seem as though the FDA has had knowledge of arsenic-contaminated food all along. He creates a notion that so many of us fear – a cold-hearted government organization that misleads and exploits us common people, and thus leaves an impression on our ethos. He strongly maintains this concept throughout the course of the entire article. Beginning paragraph two with “Even worse,” he continues to invest in his effort to exaggerate an issue of which he has yet to thoroughly establish. He hasn’t provided essential details for his claims, and leaves us only with his assumptions. For example, in p2 he mentions “Until this new study, both the poultry industry and the FDA denied that arsenic

More about Rhetorical Analysis Of Naturalfoodnews.Com Article

Open Document