How Did The Civil War Affect The Economy In The 1900's

856 Words4 Pages
If the civil war had not been fought, I think slavery would have eventually ended. During the mid 1800's slavery was a profitable investment but becoming less and less profitable. Plantation owners were trying to maximize their profits which caused a lot of moral issues as well as economic issues. Due to increasing public pressure and the beginning of factories, slavery would not have been a problem for much longer than the 1920's if the Civil War not been fought. If the civil war had not been fought is it possible to conclude that slavery would have persisted until at least the 1900's. Slavery was immoral and just wrong at all levels. The opinion of slavery was very popular and talked about all around the world. England for instance, looked…show more content…
If the Civil War not taken place, the South would have started to modernize which would have required some skilled labor. Slaves had to be watched constantly. Technology makes slaves useless. Slavery is argued to slow down technology growth because instead of increasing the uselessness of labor the owners of slaves would just purchase more slaves. America was not slowing down its technology advancements, creating less of a need for slaves. New technology and economic expansion would have made slavery disappear in an evolving economy. Henry Grady was a man who was dying for economic expansion and northern capital flow into the South. During the mid to late 1800's another producer of cotton rose up, making the need for slaves decline. The opportunity cost for cotton was becoming too high for investors of southern plantations. They put their money into railroads, steel and many other industries. The use of slavery was no longer needed as it was before. The country was growing at a considerable rate, and demand now shifted to railroads and other expansion. The United States went through some rough times after the Civil…show more content…
Slavery was becoming an outdated since industry and factories started to make profits bigger for investors. Supply and demand would have eventually stopped slavery. new technology would have made the supply of cotton or another crop increase while the demand for labor would have gone down. Slaves were necessary in building America in the earlier years, but when technology evolved, there wasn’t a need for slaves. Slavery became outdated due a lot of technology that we have seen in our lifetime. Slavery if looked at as property and this was just another necessary tool in building the country, but is not needed forever and would eventually be replace. Just like other inventions that we relied on so much but then were replaced by something better. The same thing would have happened to slavery. Slavery was replaced by technology thus eliminating the cost benefits of slavery. So yes, I do believe that slavery was bound to die out at some point. What you just read was proof that evolution would take away the need for slavery. With or without the civil war, slavery was bound to fade
Open Document