Heathcliff: Victim or Fiend?

684 Words3 Pages
I believe that when Heathcliff first joins the Earnshaw family, he is immediately positioned as an outsider through the fact that he does not look like the others. The fact that he is described a ‘gypsy brat’ from the outset suggests that he is a victim of a certain amount of prejudice as soon as he arrives at Wuthering Heights. Found in the ‘streets of Liverpool’, he is given the name of a dead child and does not have a clear identity within the Earnshaw household. Despite Mr Earnshaw’s desire to have him become a proper member of the family, he never really fits in. Both Hindley and the Lintons treat him as an unwanted interloper and this obviously affects Heathcliff’s behaviour and attitudes within the novel. Subsequent to the death of Mr Earnshaw, Hindley is able to treat Heathcliff in any way he desires and therefore relegates him to the status of servant and seems to encourage others to do the same. Whilst Heathcliff wishes (if only temporarily) that he ‘”was dressed and behaved as well”’ as Edgar, he cannot avoid acting out his violent nature when Edgar is rude to him. Heathcliff seems to have learned some of his bad behaviour from Hindley whose ‘bad ways and bad companions formed a pretty example for Catherine and Heathcliff’ after the death of Frances. I believe that, whilst the treatment meted out to Heathcliff by these characters is obvious prejudice, it does not particularly affect him. It is only when Catherine declares that ‘”It would degrade me to marry [Heathcliff] now”’ that he fully appreciates the fact that his social position is a hindrance to his progression in life. Leaving the area, he goes away for three years and returns, having tried to better himself. This does not, however, alter the fact that certain people still refer to him as ‘the plough boy’. It seems, therefore, that he cannot escape from his origins, or rather the lack of them.
Open Document