Global Warming Controversy: Al Gore And Daniel Botkin

1338 Words6 Pages
June Avant English 101 November 22, 2010 Global Warming Controversy Global warming is an increase in the average temperature of the earth’s atmosphere which causes climatic changes. Global warming leads to changes in rainfall patterns, sea level, negative impacts on plants, wildlife, and humans. Al Gore and Daniel Botkin both have great points about global warming. Botkin has a scientific perspective about global warming; however, Gore’s position is better. Al Gore uses facts and evidence to support his views about global warming. He also uses Winston Churchill and different challenges from the past that people solved to argue his point. Al Gore was vice president for two terms under Bill Clinton and is from Nashville…show more content…
For example, Hurricane Katrina was a strong category five storm that was above average because of global warming. Gore mentions how textbooks were changed and how, in the United States, cities have broken all-time records for catastrophic weather conditions. Now is the time to act to prevent global warming before it destroys more people’s lives. Textbooks had to be rewritten when the first hurricane hit Brazil. Gore stated that the books used to say, "It's impossible to have a hurricane in the South Atlantic” (618). The books also changed when Japan had ten typhoons. That was an all-time record because the year before, there were only seven. Gore also tells about how the catastrophic weather conditions in United States’ cities have broken all-time records as well as Mumbai, India, which received thirty-seven inches of rain in twenty-four hours killing thousands of people. Gore also asserts that global warming is caused by over population. Toxins and chemicals in the atmosphere impact each individual in the world. Because of the effects of global warming, the strength of hurricanes can change easily and cause an enormous amount of…show more content…
Just image, if another hurricane like Katrina were to come somewhere close and destroy everything, family members, friends, babies, and animals would be hurt, homeless, or dead. All familiar artifacts would be gone, washed away by floods. Only memories would remain. How would people feel then? Gore wants people to be aware of global warming, the effects that it has on the environment, and work immediately towards fixing it. Now that the facts are stated, should people act now or dismiss thoughts about global warming? To answer that, people should act now, be aware of global warming, and work toward solving
Open Document