Ethical Issues in Social Psychology Research

1449 Words6 Pages
Ethical Issues In Social Psychology Research Donna Ware Capella University PSYC3520 Professor Julie Johnson August 19, 2012 Abstract Participants in psychological research from a methodological perspective are sometimes deceptive. The deception is either in the setting, reason or the design of the study. Most researchers believe that methodological deception is okay and that the code of ethics should be revised. There are some concerns of this kind of deception and its’ risk of psychological harm of the participants as well as violating their freedom or independence. So, looking at how some of the ethical issues using deception in research concerns can come about and comparing two studies such as the Milgram’s Study and the Zimbardo Prison Study to determine if deception used was justifiable. And to determine whether or not these type of studies should be done today. Ethical Issues Debates It is debated that whether deception used in methodology research should be used. Deceptive measures can be used without hurting or harming the participants and/or violating freedom. According to the code of ethics, under the general principles, namely Standard 1, Resolving Ethical Issues, 8.07 A and B”8.07 Deception in Research “(a) Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by study’s significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and that effective non-deceptive alternative procedures are not feasible. (b) Psychologists do not deceive prospective participants about research that is reasonably expected to cause physical pain or severe emotional distress.” First, deception for the time being seems to be the only way to attain information regarding any psychological

More about Ethical Issues in Social Psychology Research

Open Document