Economic Analysis: Classical Vs. Keynesian

1654 Words7 Pages
Budget Paper Budget Economists are constantly debating different ways on how to keep our country’s economy growing and stable. There are two theories that are used as foundations in guiding these economy debates. There is the Keynesian Economics theory and there is the Classical Economics theory. Both of these theories contain ideals that would be beneficial to any economy, none the less they both have strong followers who carry very passionate views about why they may chose one theory over the other. Using research I will summarize each theory followed by a comparison and contrast of both theoretical ideologies, and how these two theories impact the local economy. I will also show my perception on budgets as it relates to public management and the two economic theories. The Classical economic theory was brought forth by Adam Smith through his books The Wealth of Nations, published as a five-book series. According to the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, Smith believed that economic development was best fostered in an environment of free competition that operated in accordance with universal “natural laws, sought to reveal the nature and cause of a nation’s prosperity. Smith saw the main cause of prosperity as increasing division of labor. Today Smith’s reputation rests on his explanation of how rational self-interest in a free-market economy leads to economic well-being. This economic theory is based in the assumption that the free market would always balance itself when it comes to employment and other labor issues. Classical theory under Smith had a survival of the fittest outlook. Smith thought one’s own self interest would help to balance out the economy for the greater good. It was thought that changes in demand would push the economy to a full employment level and ensure that the labor market is always in equilibrium where supply would

More about Economic Analysis: Classical Vs. Keynesian

Open Document