Compare How Futility and One Other Poem from 'Conflict' Deal with the Theme of Death?

1225 Words5 Pages
Q. Compare how futility and one other poem from 'conflict' deal with the theme of death? I will be comparing the two poems; futility and Mametz wood from 'conflict' in regards’ to the theme of death. The poems futility and Mametz wood both deal with the grim subject of death on the battlefield, and how those who fell to this fate were often left where they fell – with their last moments captured in either their corpses soon after or the skeletons discovered long after the war had ended. Neither of the two poems deals directly with the moment of death, but rather reflection on the loss of young life. As death in battle is usually seen as a rather honourable fate, the language is respectful towards the soldiers and concentrates on the great sacrifice made by the soldiers, rather than the details of the battle itself. Mametz wood is set “years afterwards” the war where several decaying corpses have just been discovered, devoid of life and soul, with terror etched onto the remains of their faces. Futility is also set in the aftermath but a soldier is dying in the arms of a helpless person who begins to question the significance of life itself. The use of language in Mametz wood such as “wasted young” and “nesting machine guns” portrays the poet’s sincere yet sorrowful feelings of death in war. Sheers believes the “young” have “wasted” their lives fighting in the war, when they could have attained much safer jobs, where the risk of death would have been minimal. Sheers use of “young” leads the reader to become aware of the issue of the majority of soldiers being youthful, whose lives have just started and they have yet not developed fully in understanding. In contrast, Owen does not use specific words to display his emotions towards these superfluous wars. Instead, Owens utilises rhetorical questions such as “O what made fatuous sunbeams toil…” Owen is becoming
Open Document