Centralia No. 5 Case Study Analysis

538 Words3 Pages
The 1947, Centralia Mine No. 5 coal mine explosion was a catastrophic disaster that could have been avoided had the administrative parties involved been more proactive and accountable. Lack of involvement of the owning company, noncompliance with suggested recommendations, a broken chain-of-command and unethical political practices contributed to the death of 111 men. Ideally, the separation of politics and administration may have prevented this calamitous event. Owners of Centralia Mine No. 5, Centralia Coal Company and Bell & Zoeller, neglected to employ a local body to routinely inspect and regulate this mine (Stillman 2010 p. 31). This resulted in the Illinois Department of Mines and Minerals being the sole party responsible for the oversight of this mine. Between 1942 and 1944 Illinois state inspector, Driscoll Scalan inspected the mines every three months (Stillman, 2010 p. 32). After each inspection, Scalan submitted in-depth reports to the Illinois Department of Mines and Minerals filled with hazardous violations that would ultimately be the cause of the fatal explosion. Along with reports and recommendations, William Rowekamp, recording secretary of the Local Union 52, submitted multiple complaint letters to both the Department of Mines and Minerals and to the Governor of Illinois, Dwight H. Green. Although both Robert M. Medill, Director of the Illinois Department of Mines and Minerals and his Assistant Director, Robert Weir, received the reports and letters, they neglected to enforce recommendations. The Illinois Department of Mines and Minerals sent over a dozen letters to Centralia asking them to comply with state regulations. Centralia never responded, nor did the company comply and both Medill and Weir neglected to follow up. Centralia blamed the war and a shortage of workers on why the recommended actions were not taken. It wasn’t until 1946,

More about Centralia No. 5 Case Study Analysis

Open Document