Robin’s Wood, Inc identified Anthony Monforte as its employee who did the actual painting of the steps. The property owners also alluded to the fact that they would contact Montforte and provide diligent attempts to have him appear in court. Court hearings were reset twice due to failure of producing Monforte or a representative in court. This occurred even after The Supreme Court ordered they provide someone within 30 days. On August 18, 2004, the plaintiff moved to strike the defendant's answer based upon the defendant's failure to produce a representative.
Nevertheless, the two Damms remained there nearly two hours conversing and drinking coffee. Apparently, it was the intention of Damms to induce reconciliation between mother and daughter, hoping it would result in one between himself and his wife, but not much progress was achieved in such direction. At the conclusion of the conversation, Mrs. Damms expressed the wish to phone for a taxicab to take her to work. Damms insisted on her getting into his car, and said he would drive her to work. They again entered his car, but instead of driving south toward her place of employment, he drove in the opposite direction.
If his current wage is $15.00 per hour, how much will he make per year?15*40*52= $31,200.00 annually 2. How much would Joe’s wages be in an average month?31200.00/12 = $2600.00 3. Based upon the information in the video, Joe has a car payment of $249 per month. The average utilities are: Electricity,
On January 1, 2013, the undepreciated capital cost for Class 10.1 was $22,950. The Class 10.1 car was purchased in 2011 for $34,000. During 2013, it was sold for $21,000. A new automobile was purchased for $36,160, which included HST of $4,160. ABC Ltd. is registered to collect and remit HST.
Basically the MSPB put the ball back in Charles Richmond ballpark saying he should have known better. The MSPB claimed that OPM cannot be held liable when the statues are posted about eligibility. Charles Richmond appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit after MSPB denied his claim. Decisions The Court of Appeals granted certiorari. The Federal Court was divided and reversed the decision agreeing with Charles that the misinformation of the Navy specialist estopped the
Case Analysis: Baker v Osborne Development Corporation Amelia Smith LS311-06 Business Law Kaplan University February 14, 2012 The new homeowners would be able to sue the homebuilder, Osborne Development Corporation. The California Court of Appeals found that the trial court’s decision was correct and that the arbitration agreement was both procedurally and substantively unconscionable thus making the arbitration agreement unenforceable. The reason that the trial courts found the arbitration agreement was procedurally substantively unconscionable was the fact that the agreement was not present in the terms of any of the contracts between the buyer and the builder. The homebuyers were not given the application of warranty by HBW until about a day or so before the scheduled close of escrow and the terms of the arbitration agreement were not present within the application. NCR Corporation v Korala Associates was a case that was concerning the unauthorized copying of computer software by KAL.
No other persons were within hearing distance of the incident. The questions needing to be answered are, If Garcia sues Belk’s, under what theory or theories of law will he bring suit and what rules of law will he use to help him win? What arguments and rules of law will Belk’s use to defend itself and who will win. Should Garcia choose to sue the Belk Corporation he may do so using the Defamation of Character/Slander theory. The case of Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976) examines a case of defamation of character by the defendant in which the accused was said to have destroyed Mr. Davis’s name and character by unlawfully soliciting that he was a prior shoplifter to the community when Mr. Davis had in fact been cleared of the charges prior to the solicitation.
(TCOs 3, 4, 5, & 7) Damien, not a dealer in real estate, sold real estate with a basis of $250,000 for $500,000 cash, a note for $250,000, and the buyer assumed Damien’s mortgage on the property of $125,000. During the year, the purchaser paid Damien $30,000 principal and
a) What is their AGI for the year? b) What is the amount of suspended losses, if any, that may be carried over with respect to each activity? 3) In the current tax year, Neil’s personal automobile was totaled in a traffic accident. Neil had purchased the automobile two years earlier for $28,000. The FMV of the automobile just prior to the accident was $18,000.
When son was old enough his dad bought him a Cadillac for his first car in 1921. That same year 4 days later he got into an accident and dad pays for all repairs. Son has just graduated and makes it into Stanford University. The dad