State of Confusion Edmund Peabody University of Phoenix Business Law BUS/415 Sherry Goodrum February 13, 2012 State of Confusion The state of Confusion endorsed an order entailing that all trucks and towing trailers that use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. This hitch is created by only one company in Confusion. The outcome of this decree is that any truck driver who wishes to drive through Confusion must stop and have the new hitch mounted, or drive around Confusion. The federal government has not made any effort to adjust the truck hitches used on the nation’s highways. Tanya Tucker, who is the owner of a trucking company in the state of Denial, is not pleased about the added rate this statute enforces on her company.
Legal Environment and State of Confusion State of Confusion and the Law The state of Confusion enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers to use a B-type truck hitch. This hitch is manufactured by only one manufacturer in Confusion. The result of this statute is that any trucker who wants to drive through Confusion must stop to have the new hitch installed, or drive around Confusion. The federal government does not regulate the truck hitches used on the nation’s highways. Tanya Trucker, who owns a trucking company in the state of Denial, is not happy about the additional expense this statute imposes on her business.
State of Confusion The state of Confusion has promulgated a statute necessitating all trucks and towing trailers that travel its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. As a result of this statute, any trucker who wants to drive through Confusion must stop and have the new hitch installed or drive around Confusion. Moreover, only one manufacturer in Confusion produces this hitch. The federal government has not made any effort to standardize truck hitches being used on highways in the United States. Tanya Trucker owns a trucking company in the state of Denial and is not happy about the added expense this statute forces on her business.
State of Confusion Paper BUS/415 This case is between the B-type truck manufacturer in the state of Confusion and Tanya Trucker in the state of Denial. The case is about Tanya’s dislike with the state of Confusion, requiring anyone wishing to drive trucks in the state to install a B-type hitch. The hitch is manufactured only by one supplier in Confusion, so any truck that has to drive through the state must stop at that supplier and have the hitch installed or be held liable for any added expense while driving around the state of Confusion. Tanya Tucker owns a trucking company in the state of Denial and is upset about the situation in the state of Confusion and is planning to sue the state to have the statute overturned. The tenth Amendment
For those chosen the juror's oath is administered. The Trial The trial begins with counsel making brief opening statements for each side. Evidence such as exhibits and testimony, direct, and cross examination. During the last part of the trial phase the counsel gives closing arguments. Judge's Charge to the Jury After the main trial phase the judge will address the jury.
State of Confusion State of Confusion The state of Confusion has decided to enact a statue that requires all trucks and towing trailers that use their highways to use a B-type truck hitch. The only company that manufactures the B-type hitches is located in the state of Confusion. This new statues requires that any trucker who wants to drive through the state of Confusion would have to install the new hitch or not drive through the state of Confusion. The federal government has not regulated the truck hitches required on the nation’s highways. Tanya Trucker, owns a trucking company in the state of Denial is not happy about the additional expenses she will have incur by installing these new truck hitches.
The right to present evidence ensures that parties will receive a fair judgment pertaining to the facts surrounding the case. 5. The right to cross examination provides parties with the opportunity to confront opposing witnesses and evidence before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) makes his decision (DeLeo, 2008). B. Informal 1.
I observed the police prosecutors consulting the defendants’ legal agent on many occasions discussing alternatives to a prison sentence and what the prosecutors felt was fair in way of punishment for this defendant. The bench clerk is the person appointed to assist the Magistrate in the court
A written statement submitted to the court to persuade it as to the correctness of a party’s positions is: (Points : 2) a. Memorandum of law b. Interrogatory c. Bill of particulars d. Verification 3. The initial pleading in a civil action in which plaintiff alleges a cause of actions is: (Points : 2) a. Counterclaim b. Response c. Cross-action d. Complaint 4. The person who brings a lawsuit is called a: (Points
Pretrial Defense Motions By: Rebecca Taylor Pretrial hearings take place after a defendant has had a preliminary hearing or a grand jury indictment. A defense attorney uses pretrial hearings to set boundaries on the prosecution during the trial stage. What evidence can be used, the types of arguments that can be made, and what witnesses may appear to testify ends up being based on what pretrial motions are made and whether they are permitted or rejected. There are a multitude of motions that a defense attorney may file, and a couple possible motions that a defense might propose during pretrial hearings are motions to suppress, motions in limine, and discovery of evidence. Motions to Suppress The most commonly used defense motion