Surely, gender is not the main factor to decide that who can do good job in military because women can be a good sodier in some duties. Besides, women should be allowed into combat because of the following reasons: women can do good at leadership position, increasing more jobs for women today and women can do some specific jobs that male can not complete. First of all, women can do good at leadership position. In the past decades, women did not allowed to join in high positions such as: CEO, boss, manager or they could not allowed to run for president because women are emotional. In addition, people thought that women are too sensitive when they face to problems so they often solve the problems by their heart than their mind.
In the story “They Each Had a Gun,” Hannah LaMarca was robbed and assaulted with no way to defend herself. Had she been armed and trained in the use of a firearm, it is likely the outcome would have been different. We also can’t ignore the usefulness of a firearm as a deterrent to a criminal. Gun control advocates are so quick to cite statistics of gun deaths from any source they latch on to. It’s a shame that we don’t have much statistics for crimes that have been adverted because a robber or rapist changed his mind about attacking an armed person.
She relives certain events that put her in a position of inequality toward the opposite sex. A woman who travels alone is advised, usually by men, to protect herself by avoiding bars and other “dangerous situations,” by approaching her car like an Indian scout, by locking doors and windows. (Hasselstrom 355) By being a cautionary person and a trained martial arts artist didn’t prove valuable when faced against an ill willed men. I agree with Hasselstrom decision on carrying a licensed gun because no matter how cautious women try to be in most situations they can’t predict what men will do or say. Hasselstrom lived her life by being a peaceful and cautious person to ward of any danger; nonetheless, she experienced situations in the past years that caused learn martial arts, get a gun, and made her aware that men and women are not equal on a physical level.
Most agree that gun-related injury or death of innocent citizens should never be tolerated, but there are opinions on the course to take in an effort to discover a solution. This paper will offer problems and solutions associated with past and present efforts to manage the issue of gun-related injuries/death. This paper will also render the discoveries and opinions of the above-mentioned group members as it relates to this controversial topic. Stricter gun-control laws do not help prevent gun-related injuries/deaths One method to prevent gun-related injuries/deaths is to make serious efforts to treat depression, mental health issues, and drug abuse in society. A large number of gun-related injuries/deaths are committed by members of society that have untreated disorders and others that simply neglect firearm safety rules and existing gun-control laws.
Guns have become a very important controversy in the U.S. Some believe we should have them and some of us do not believe in them at all. Some of us also believe we should only be allowed to have a few just for protection. When it comes to guns if you are going to own one and use it, you should know about how they work and why they work before you get one. Do not just get one to be jumping on the bandwagon just because “everyone else” is.
The main topic is however, should other people besides the police be able to carry and own a gun. I can say that we would all agree that guns or any type of weapons are not wanted in "just anybody's hands". However, this is the very reason we need to be able to protect ourselves. There are people in this world that are not mentally stable, and if they want to have a gun, they will have a gun whether obtained legally or illegally. This knowledge alone should make people understand why everyone should be allowed, at least given the opportunity to own a gun.
We face a problem of full accountability, many owners purchase weapons without thought of receiving training for or how to secure the weapon. It is proven that “cultural orientations condition individuals’ beliefs about risk through culturally partisan forms of trust” and that “The people they trust, naturally enough, tend to be the ones who share their worldviews” (Braman and Kahan 576). Gun owners and gun controllers continually profess to the need/no need of the weapons with the many excuses but when paired down to the most basic reasoning it is “that insufficient gun control will expose to many innocent persons to deliberate of accidental shootings; and that the excessive gun control will render too many law-abiding citizens vulnerable to the violent predations” (Braman and Kahan 577). The opposition to legalized gun owner ship responds to the claims of need with their own reasoning to remove all weapons with the exceptions of government officials by reiterating with the statement that “the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution is targeted towards
Cognitive Dissonance Margaret Horner, Chantel Mcluskie, Melissa Harris, Shawn Estridge, Jeffery McGlothen PSY400 Adrian Fletcher July 23, 2012 This paper will cover the situation of texting while driving. You will meet a young woman who has received a text while she is driving. Although she knows that texting while driving is illegal, and dangerous, she will still reply to the text. Meet Mary Mary is on her way to work. As she is driving she hears a tune, and knows it is a text.
Summary of “Ban The Things. Ban Them All.” In the essay, “Ban The Things. Ban Them All,” written by Molly Ivins, she expresses concern about society’s ownership of guns, and how they have grown to be used more of a weapon for show, than for protection. Ivins also argues that the argument of “guns don’t kill people,” doesn’t exist, because she believes that they do, and that that may be all they ever do. Ivins states that she supports the Second Amendment: “A well–regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to bear arms shall not be infringed,”(437) and that adolescents in our society are NOT part of a well-regulated militia: “[there are] teenage drug dealers…cruising the cites of this nation perforating their fellow citizens with assault rifles” (437).
I choose a specific department in the detective work, which is domestic violence because it shouldn’t happen to anyone no matter what. I don’t just want to arrest people, I want to help them and protect them. I watch my mother get beat in plenty of relationships but I couldn’t do anything about it as a child.