Is the real estate subsidiary a good idea? If the managers buy more stock, what is the appropriate price? There are two major concerns which are gaining competitive advantage and determining comparable valuations. Brazos should allow the company to sell the managers some stock of the business to benefit the managers. But the amount that a manager can hold stocks should be limited because the ownership would be split in this way as it is not good for Brazos itself to decrease its ownership.
As stated in extract 1, it tells us that the goods we import are not made in the UK and so makes it impossible to replace the imports, therefore meaning that we still have to import goods, despite the high prices due to the low exchange rate of sterling. This is partnered with the fact that some suppliers (shown in extract 1) have agreed long term supply contract with cheaper overseas suppliers before the depreciation of the sterling and so they are now paying high prices. This may mean that these suppliers may have to increase the prices of these goods, therefore leading to cost push inflation due to trying to maintain a decent profit margin in the hope the demand for the good does not drop dramatically. However, it is stated that there still may be a large price differential with countries such as China and India, even after sterling's depreciation. On the other hand however, as stated in extract 1, line 8, volume of good imported has also increased by 16% and inflation has continued well above target.
If the IRR is less than the WACC, the project should be rejected, as it impoverishes the firm’s owners. If the IRR equals the WACC, it earns only normal profits (i.e., the owners’ opportunity costs) and accepting it is a matter of indifference. In this care the project’s IRR is 18.031 > 11.88%, therefore the IRR rule tells us the same as the NPV rule: this project will enrich the firm’s owners. We note in passing that in more advanced courses in finance you would learn about projects for which this rule cannot be used. Broadly speaking, they are projects whose cash flows changes sign more than once—e.g., from negative to positive to negative again.
CanGo has very low profitability ratios, low turnover ratios and a high debt equity ratio. All these demonstrates that it’s in Cango’s best interest to take control of their financial performance, and focus on generating cash for the company, make better use of available resources and ensure that they are able to generate profit. The company should not take more debt and need to focus on how to use their existing resources to generate more cash flow to be able to operate and meet their financial obligations. Under the current operating system debt is increasingly being
The managers of each division were allowed considerable autonomy if their performances were at least on plan. Performance was evaluated, and management bonuses were assigned, based on each division’s achievement of budgeted targets for return on invested capital (ROIC) and sales growth. Even though the company was partly vertically integrated, division managers were allowed to source their components from external suppliers if they so chose. In August 2002, a pricing dispute arose between the managers of 3 of the divisions of Zumwald AG: Imaging Systems Division (ISD), the Heidelberg Division (Heidelberg), and the Electronic Components Division (ECD). The case describes a transfer pricing issue that is common in decentralized, divisionalized firms.
CAGR: Operating income, % Operating income (EBIT) measures a company's earning power from ongoing operations and it largely used by investor because it excludes the effects of different capital structures and tax rates used in different companies. EBIT is "capital structure neutral" and is therefore a more appropriate way of comparing the earnings of different companies than net income
| 2(3)Some product knowledge will exist from current sales members, but some training will be needed for new sales people. | | Financing/ROI knowledge of sales team(2) | 3(2)Unfamiliar with pricing and financing low-cost products, and would require motivation to get commission off lower-priced sales made. | 1(2)Has the most experience with financing all sorts of price-leveled products. | 2(2)There will be a lack of knowledge from the existing team, but can piggy-back off of the knowledge from the ISR’s.
The paradox of efficient market hypothesis is that some investors have to believe that market for the market to continue to be efficient. Explain your understanding of the above paradox. Include in your discussion the forms of market hypothesis. The paradox of efficient market is that if every investor believed a market was efficient, then the market would not be efficient because no one would analyze securities. In effect, efficient markets depend on market participants who believe the market is inefficient and trade securities in an attempt to outperform the market.
It merely reflects what the audience wants or views as important. Pluralists also argue that concentration of ownership is a product of economic rationality rather than political or sinister motives. It is driven by the need to keep costs low and to maximise profits. Globalisation too results from the need to find new audiences rather than from cultural imperialism. Pluralists argue that it is practically impossible for owners to interfere with the content of newspapers and television programmes because their businesses are economically far too complex for them to regularly interfere in the day-to-day running or the content.
A country can be a capital (or labor)-abundant nations and labor (or capital)-scarce nations which consider their comparative advantage in technologies, input productivity, and wages of labor. Free trade can bring a lot of advantage to us; however, it does not apply in real world. Tariff and non-tariff are the tools that use to trade protection or prevent the economy from undergoing adjustment during economic stagnation. Although tariff and other restriction can concede the economic losses and using resource with less efficiency, but protectionism argue that non-economic benefit such as a national security can more than offset those economic losses. Normally trade protection is use to secure domestic industry and labor union’s economy welfare.