If he did not, he would not taught ,explained and helped David to understand about Waknuk's rules and their views on people who are different from the image of God. He also would not cares about David and wants to protect him. The last example is “ It was a great satisfaction to learn and know more, it helped to ease one over a lot of puzzling matters, and I began to understand many of the things Uncle Axel talked about much better, nevertheless, it brought, too, the first taste of complications from which we would never again be free. ” (8, 82) This happened after David’s aunt die, he develops an intense desire to become normal. He was so scared that someone will find out about him.
Introduction: In this assignment i will be explaining my own views and attitude againt diversity, and how it could impact on work with young children and young people. Assessment Criteria 2.3 In my own opinion everyone has different kinds of opinions and values than to others. When you work with children from a young age. You start to realize that it's not always needed for you to be aware of them. So say if you act out on these attitudes, it could have a bad effect on the children your working with and other children they might know, and you would not want them to copy your own actions in a result.
How far do the sources suggest that Wolsey’s efforts to secure the annulment were half-hearted? (20 marks) Although sources 1, 2 and 3 make suggestions towards Wolsey’s lack of effort in gaining an annulment for Henry, they all generally agree in the fact that his ability and determination to fill Henry with the hope that he would succeed in obtaining the annulment showed that Wolsey made gaining the annulment his main priority which he did try to achieve whole heartedly. Firstly, sources 1 and 2 both agree that Wolsey was wasteful with his resources he had art his disposal and that he did not make an efficient use of not only this, but also his situation. Source 2 states that “Wolsey has marvelous contacts” and “…yet has not made use of this”. It can be implied from this that Wolsey had the ability to obtain Henry’s annulment, but failed due to his lack of effort and his half-hearted approach.
To express this in other words, if you are working on a hard problem, you are going to make mistakes. It’s easy to expect perfection from ourselves and/or the fear the judgment that comes with “messing up”. Even at its worse, we learn from those errors to really dive into the problem for a successful result. That is not a new concept, but it is one that is often forgotten. Mistakes are actually indicators that you are actually trying to succeed, so without them you are not doing much at all.
The author uses characterization to support the quotes interpretation. The inventor was a quiet hardworking guy, but at the end his mixed emotions of love and anger caused him to be brave and outspoken. Evidently, Lincoln’s quote “I claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me” interpretations can be demonstrated
In addition to Curley though, George’s action can be seen as an act of justice as he kept others out of harm’s way from Lennie’s inexcusable but accidental strength. Although George’s decision can be justified, they can more so be condemned. By George’s continuous verbal expression of his anger towards Lennie, it does seem to only bring them closer; their co-dependent relationship would cease to exist without one another. Throughout the text the idea of “i got you... and you got me ...” is thoroughly explored. The two men have something that many of the men on ranches in the 1930’s wish they all had; a partner.
But yet again it comes to the point of him writing something meaningful and something that will make him regret what he has done. I say that the only reason every letter should be meaningful is because he could be writing anything he wants just to avoid further punishment. Part of me agrees with the punishment because no one can tell if he is writing the truth about how he feels except for him. Also, the fact that the family doesn’t say anything about him being punished more makes me believe that they are satisfied with the punishment. If Andrew is being honest about what he is writing then it is a
However, in Fahrenheit 451 Beatty describes conformity as a positive aspect of society – he argues that conformity in behavior prevents violence and jealousy by restricting the gifted and talented people from their ability to excel, which is good in a way because then the others won‘t feel bad. However, the real problem in the situation Beatty describes is not the exceptionally bright child (when he is trying to show Montag the uselessness of books) but the group of people of those who submit to it. Unfortunately, this very situation occurs repeatedly in our society today. People who choose not to conform may be persecuted by the groups of people who submit into censorship, and through that act of persecution the people reinforce conformity of
2). In other words, Sharp and Cartwright believe that even though many people were aware that something catastrophic was occurring, they still did nothing to prevent it; moreover, the acts of “nothing” has given a greater advantage towards the spread of genocide. Sharp and Cartwright’s theory that the spread of genocide is due to inaction is extremely useful because it shreds insight into the difficult problem of the genocide dissemination. Similar to Sharp and Cartwright’s theory, Elie Wiesel, a concentration camp prisoner from the Holocaust of World War II, mentions his memories in Buna, a concentration camp where he was imprisoned with his father; moreover, he notes that several times within a
Was it his sloth-like behavior that prevented him from changing? Or were his views on the environment too much to overcome? My feeling is that some people simply need the right incentive to change their behavior. If I offered my friend some type of benefit, he more than likely would have recycled. Although I was unable to change my friends wasteful behavior, I was not deterred.