Women In Sassouma Berete's Sundiata

1580 Words7 Pages
Sundiata: The Epic of Male Puissance Throughout the Epic of Sundiata, women are portrayed in a variety of different lights, however, it seems that patriarchal modes of thinking are most aptly intertwined with each and every representation. It is quite evident that there was an extreme division of power between men and women throughout, and that women’s positions of influence were indubitably and inextricably interwoven with the males in their lives. Along with such insidious notions, women often seem to be placated and objectified. However, it should be noted that in some regard it is tangible that women have, to some extent, a minute level of agency, relatively instrumental to their male counterpart’s role, but only as a supportive entity.…show more content…
Manding Bory. Once again, we are instructed to see women as inhumane, one-dimensional, base creatures of the fairer sex. She is portrayed as a tyrannical leader after the death of her husband, King Nare Maghan, as she disobeys his wishes and acts as imperious force against his other wives and their offspring, including the prolific Sundiata, the supposedly deserving heir to his throne. It is important to note that this emphasis on her cruelty ties hand in hand into another archaic and paternalistic ideal that women are neither capable nor suitable of being nonpartisan rulers, and are bound to the emotional feminine binary, rather than the dichotic male rationale. Yet, it can be noted throughout the text that although her actions were supposedly of a dishonourable and sinister nature, but they may also be construed as an attempt to protect both her own and her son’s future prospects. In a moment of self-reflection, the epic reads, “what would become of her, Sassouma Berete, if her son…was disinherited in favour of the child that Sogolon was going to bring into the world?” (Niane, p.13) Thus, it must also be noted, that although the reader is supposed to discern this antagonistic woman as an evil-doer, she too was attempting to secure a…show more content…
However, luckily for Sundiata, his half-sister, one of the daughters of his prior nemesis, Sassouma, was seemingly forced into a marriage alliance with this new ruler. Strangely enough, she pledges allegiance to her brother’s and mother’s foe, Sundiata. She does this by perpetuating the ideal of a faithful wife to her husband in order to learn the secrets of his magic and his kingdom, in order to expose his weaknesses to Sundiata within their battle. Once again, this plays into the instrumentality of women succumbing to the machismos in their lives. To begin with, she was used merely as a tool to gain a symbiotic relationship between Mali and its neighbouring kingdom, Sosso and benefit the powerful men surrounding her. While her action against her husband could possibly be construed as an autonomous decision, it was ultimately done solely to create an advantage for another man in her life. Another interesting facet of this portion of the epic is that after she seemingly plays a prodigious role in the defeat of the evil sorcerer, she is neither mentioned nor thanked in the aftermath of Sundiata’s
Open Document