Why Anna Maria Van Schurman Wrote the Way She Did

5563 Words23 Pages
Schurman’s Discourse: Motives for Language of Syllogism and Reason in The Learned Maid or Whether a Maid May Be a Scholar? (1641) “… and when it offended others, as if he was mocking them, he answered that it had not been his intention, but that his grandmother, being a woman of respected age and intellect, would occupy the position with more efficiency than all the others mentioned by them before …… Oh, man’s envious nature!”[1] When, in 1618, a member of the Dordrecht municipality suggest his grandmother as a possible new candidate at a counsel meeting, his colleagues are offended and take it is a joke. This incident in the Dutch harbor town was noted down by a renowned physician of the time, who was himself probably a Dordrecht municipality member, Johan van Beverwijck. What happened at the meeting must have interested Beverwijck; the fact that he adds his opinion about his colleagues’ reaction, moreover, shows he disagreed with them. It comes as no surprise therefore, that in1939 he published a tract called Of the Excellence of the Female Sex (originally in Latin, De excellentia foemini sexus in 1636), in which he praises women’s intellectual abilities in a style comparable to that of his sixteenth century predecessors Erasmus and Vives. Although Beverwijck admits in his writings that he expects his own daughters not to underestimate the importance of marriage and house management, he becomes one of Holland’s most famous patrons for talented young ladies in the Dutch golden age. One of those young women he admired for her intellect and modesty was Anna Maria van Schuurman. Three years before the publication of Beverwijck’s tract about female excellence, van Schuurman wrote a dissertation in favor of women’s education, Dissertatio de ingenii mulieribus ad doctrinam (a.k.a. The Learned Maid or Whether a Maid May Be a Scholar?).
Open Document