This is the main reason that a lot of people want to have the driving age raised. They think that when these teens are a little older, their risk of crashing will significantly decrease, making roads safer for all. The problem with this logic is that the main reason that this age group has the highest crash rate is that they are the least experienced. If the driving age is raised, the only thing that will change is the age group of the inexperienced drivers. Instead, a good idea would be to increase the amount of time a teen needs a permit for, in order to get more experience before actually getting a license.
As you can see, the seriousness of alcoholism is by far worse than what most teenagers may think it is. Lowering the drinking age that the law requires in California will not make anything more useful. Drinking at a young age could be harmful towards you, your brain, and also to others. Permitting a minor to use alcohol will also increase the percentage
Drinking Age Some argue to keep the drinking age at 21 because the brain does not finish maturing until the age of 25. It is even worse to have people drinking at age 18. Setting the drinking age at 21 has not stopped teen drinking; instead, it has increased underage binge drinking, leading to more health and life-endangering behavior by teens. Because alcohol affects everyone drastically, the drinking age should remain at 21 to keep young adults from having poor health and making poor decisions. One statistic that would argue for raising the drinking age is an examination of death rates from homicide and vehicle accidents.
Raising the drinking age seems to be creating more problems than resolutions. Wasn't the purpose of raising the drinking age to save lives? Teens are going to drink regardless of what the legally age is. There seems to be less complication with the lower drinking age. Lowering the age will allow teens to drink with supervision.
They believe that by making the drinking age a lower age, alcohol would become more accepted in American society and it would encourage more people to engage in drinking, at a younger age, as well as adults. Mothers Against Drunk Driving fight for keeping the drinking age at 21 because their organization believes that a younger drinking age would result in more drunk drivers. They think that the younger people are who are legally aloud to drink, the more irresponsible America’s alcohol-drinking people will be. Also, some people think that lowering the drinking age to 18 will result in more youth participating in binge drinking. When people binge drink, they are more likely to engage in other illegal
Researchers say “American young people engage in “binge drinking” far too often”. This is all caused from a twenty-one drinking age. The easiest way to eliminate this would to be lowering the drinking age where young adults can be monitored and learn how to drink the safe way. If young adults were allowed to drink in bars whenever they wanted, or if they could buy alcohol from a liquor store without finding someone to go on a booze run for them, then binge drinking would become less
First and foremost, the legal drinking age should be eighteen because when teens turn eighteen they are legally an adult. As an adult, a person should be trusted to make responsible decisions and not over do it. Secondly, the drinking age should be eighteen because of a lower drinking age would decrease the amount of underage drinking and limit how much trouble young people can get into. Lastly, the drinking age should be eighteen because liquor stores could charge younger people more taxes for alcohol which would help fund state programs. Some effects of a lower drinking age could also include increased health benefits.
Many suggested lowering it to 18 or 19 because it’ll help young adults be more responsible and they're legal adults. Keep it the same because of parental pushback and raising it due to older people who tend to be more responsible and developed mentally and physically. Today's youth and young adults there's more harm than good from drinking. So raising the age is more beneficial to the public's health and
Instead of making alcohol harder to get and discouraging young people, what's been happening in the last five years is alcohol is becoming cheaper and more accessible and made more interesting to young people - and young women in particular have increased their consumption “In NSW alone, every day four young people aged 18 or under are so blind drunk someone has to ring an ambulance. Some of them are as young as 12. INCREASING the drinking age is just one tough measure that would help curb random violence, according to a top health expert who says the time for "soft actions" is over. Professor Mike Daube says the US, which has a legal drinking age of 21, shows it can be done and it works, but adds that it’s “unlikely to happen” here,
The number one argument by supporters of the 21-year-old limit is that it reduces alcohol related traffic deaths. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has estimated 16,000 lives have been saved as a result of raising the legal drinking age to 21 (Straszheim). An argument against that statistic by those who don’t believe it is that there may be other reasons for the reductions in traffic fatalities, such as safer roads. Another argument is that young people start drinking long before they turn 21 even with the age limit (Goodale). Although the first fact proves that it has helped our safety on the road, what it doesn’t prove is that even though 16,000 lives have been