Voter Identification

1801 Words8 Pages
The Constitutionality of Voter Identification Laws Abstract In this election year, a popular debate is being had in politics and in the media regarding voter identification laws and the Constitutionality of such laws. This paper will discuss, and debate the Constitutionality of requiring individuals to present valid identification when voting. It will include information how the Constitution addresses issues regarding elections and their processes. Also, previous cases regarding voter registration and identification will be discussed. It will also include the current issues regarding identification in each state, the positions of each side of the argument, how these positions are being debated and the possible outcome…show more content…
Aside from the occasional unproven anecdote or baseless allegation, supporters of these laws simply cannot show that there is any need for them. Despite the Department of Justice’s 2002 “Ballot Access and Voting Integrity Initiative” promising to vigorously prosecute allegations of voter fraud, the federal government obtained only 26 convictions or guilty pleas for fraud between 2002 and 2005 (“Voter suppression in”,…show more content…
Because Indiana’s cards are free, the inconvenience of going to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, gathering required documents, and posing for a photograph does not qualify as a substantial burden on most voters’ right to vote, or represent a significant increase over the usual burdens of voting. The severity of the somewhat heavier burden that may be placed on a limited number of persons—e.g., elderly persons born out-of-state, who may have difficulty obtaining a birth certificate—is mitigated by the fact that eligible voters without photo identification may cast provisional ballots that will be counted if they execute the required affidavit at the circuit court clerk’s office. Even assuming that the burden may not be justified as to a few voters, that conclusion is by no means sufficient to establish petitioners’ right to the relief they seek” (“Supreme court”,
Open Document