Virginia Pollard's Sexual Harassment Case

583 Words3 Pages
Ans 1. The company definitely has to pay liability to Virginia Pollard. In the given case, the company is liable to only those issues which tell that Virginia is been sexual harassed by the shop floor workers. Company is liable to the fact that, those who were involved in disturbing Virginia during her work are to be punished and company has to bear a compensation for the sexual harassment done to Virginia if the harassment is proven before the court of law. In the worst scenario company may have to pay Virginia as much money as quoted by the court and other legal actions can be taken against the company. Ans 2. a. Sexual harassment is defined as the abusing or getting favors done with an agreement in terms of sex. In quid pro quo kind of sexual harassment, something is obtained from something. In most of the cases both persons will have an agreement to get something and in turn give out something. In the hostile sexual harassment, any person is been abused in terms for sexuality and there is no getting or giving up of something. Virginia Pollard was not a victim in the given case because, she was involved in weird act wherein she shown her bra from the back of shirt. This is the reason which shows that she was not a victim. b.…show more content…
In the second link given in the reference section, a case is been given wherein a supervisor was involved in quid pro quo kind of sexual harassment. In that case, supervisor threatened the sub ordinate women on her job. In the final decision employer was left free because the court said, it was the employees who were involved in the issue and employer has nothing to do with that. In the given case, with reference to the decision in the above explained case, employer can be left free as Virginia Pollard and other employees were involved in the sexual

More about Virginia Pollard's Sexual Harassment Case

Open Document