Untouchables Jonathan Kozl Analysis

1095 Words5 Pages
Kuroshe Mahak August 5th, 2012 Steve Yarborough/Engl 201 Two views on Homelessness The REAL Homeless There are as many as 2.3 to 3.5 million people who experience homelessness, this was from an estimate in 2009 by the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty (Facts and Figures). This number is on the rise, but now is in a steady plateau. I have noticed that more and more people are becoming homeless and this number needs to level out, but it does not seem like it will. The essay “Untouchables” by Jonathan Kozol speaks of the type of homeless people who are there because of inconvenient circumstance, or a set of “emergencies” that all happen at the same time. This set of emergencies causes the person to go into such a situation where…show more content…
When we as a nation try to create statistics to link homelessness to job related or other circumstance, it becomes much harder. Like the statistic I gave in the introduction, there was a range of 1.2 million. That is a monumental range that shouldn’t be there. I believe that Bliss’s type of homeless is the cause to this. This is because they are being counted when they shouldn’t. These people compared to Kozol’s type of homelessness should not be considered homeless. They are just hindrances to society. Kozol’s type on the other hand should be what the statistics are all about, yet we can’t quite differentiate the two. This is a major problem that we need to solve. The Bliss type of homeless should not be incorporated into the statistics we as a nation gather this is because they are not the true homeless people, they are the lazy and unmotivated people of society. They can choose to be houseless if they want to, but they should be excluded from any sort of statistic that we…show more content…
This causes many issues with people and society. There becomes an unneeded amount of people on the streets. This is an ethical problem because the people who choose to be on the streets could be off of the streets but they choose to be lazy and unmotivated although they shouldn’t be because they can relieve themselves of the predicament they are in. This is ethically wrong because people shouldn’t be homeless by choice. It’s not okay because it causes more money to be wasted towards people that shouldn’t be helped at all. The morals of these people who choose to be homeless are very questionable. Not only their morals, but their mental stability. Why would anyone in the right mind choose to be homeless? It makes no sense. Another reason this is an ethical problem is because we as a nation let it occur, then repeat, and we do nothing about
Open Document